Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26192132›Full record

ArticleJournal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43)2015

Holding back, intimacy, and psychological and relationship outcomes among couples coping with prostate cancer.

Sharon L Manne, David Kissane, Talia Zaider, Deborah Kashy, David Lee, Carolyn Heckman, Shannon Myers Virtue

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of interventions targeting social constraints among adults with cancer and their caregivers: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Impact of Cancer on Romantic Relationships Among Young Adults: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Couple communication in cancer: A tale of two conceptual models.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Concurrent and Prospective Associations Between Communicated Emotional Arousal and Adjustment Among Couples Coping With Cancer.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. What happens when romantic couples discuss personal loss? Relational, emotional, and physiological impacts.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Financial distress and its associated burden in couples coping with an advanced cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  18. Cancer-related psychosocial challenges.General psychiatry · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sharon L ManneSection of Population Science, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey.
David KissaneDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Talia ZaiderDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Deborah KashyDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University.
David LeeDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.
Carolyn HeckmanCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center.
Shannon Myers VirtueSection of Population Science, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USMichigan State University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Intimacy-Enhancing Couples' Intervention for Localized Prostate CancerR01CA140297 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI MANNE, SHARON L · 2011 to 2016
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study evaluated intimacy as a mechanism for the effects of holding back sharing concerns about cancer on couples' psychological distress, well-being, and marital satisfaction using the actor-partner interdependence model (APIM), and evaluated 2 possible moderators of these associations: the number of patient and spouse cancer concerns. We had 139 men treated for localized prostate cancer in the past year and their spouses complete surveys about holding back sharing cancer concerns, intimacy, distress, and relationship satisfaction, as well as patient and spouse cancer concerns. APIM-indicated that the association between holding back sharing concerns, and patient and spouse distress, well-being, and relationship satisfaction could be partially accounted for by their influence on patient and spouse perceptions of relationship intimacy. The number of cancer concerns did not moderate the mediational model. Holding back has strong associations with both partners' well-being and distress. Holding back sharing concerns was particularly detrimental for couples' intimacy and relationship satisfaction.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCommunicationMarriagePersonal SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicCounselingFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleMiddle AgedModels, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID26192132
PMCPMC5225663
OpenAlexW2416581155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.