Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26191947›Full record

Trial reportExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2015

A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic intervention for alcohol and marijuana use.

Ali M Yurasek, Ashley A Dennhardt, James G Murphy

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A pilot trial of a brief intervention for cannabis use supplemented with a substance-free activity session or relaxation training.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. How tax structures for retail cannabis shape cannabis use among youth and young adults: evidence from a volumetric choice experiment.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Alcohol Use Disorder Interventions Targeting Brain Sites for Both Conditioned Reward and Delayed Gratification.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  17. Decision Making and Alcohol: Health Policy Implications.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali M YurasekPsychology Department, University of Memphis.
Ashley A DennhardtPsychology Department, University of Memphis.
James G MurphyPsychology Department, University of Memphis.

Funding

Substance Abuse Intervention/Outcome Research TrainingT32DA016184 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Damaris J. Rohsenow, JENNIFER W. TIDEY · 2003 to 2026
$6.1M
Improving brief alcohol interventions with a behavioral economic supplementR01AA020829 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI MURPHY, JAMES G. · 2012 to 2016
$2.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020829NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA016184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent study demonstrated that a single 50-min supplemental session that targeted the behavioral economic mechanisms of substance-free reinforcement and delayed reward discounting (Substance-Free Activity Session: SFAS) enhanced the efficacy of a standard alcohol brief motivational intervention (BMI) for college drinkers. The purpose of the current study was to conduct a randomized controlled trial intended to replicate and extend the aforementioned study by focusing on both drug and alcohol misuse and reducing session length in order to enhance dissemination potential. Participants were 97 college students (58.8% women; 59.8% White/Caucasian, and 30.9% African American; M age = 20.01, SD = 2.23) who reported at least 1 heavy drinking episode in the past month (M = 4.01 episodes). Most participants (62%) reported recent marijuana use (M = 12.22 days of past-month use). After completing a baseline assessment and an individual 30-min alcohol-focused BMI, participants were randomized to either the 30-min SFAS session or an education control session. A series of mixed model intent-to-treat analyses revealed that both groups reported drinking reductions and that participants in the BMI + SFAS group reported fewer days using marijuana at the 6-month follow-up. These results do not support the incremental efficacy of the briefer SFAS for reducing drinking but suggest that it may improve marijuana outcomes. Future research is needed to identify the ideal length and timing of the SFAS supplement to BMIs.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingBehavior TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMarijuana SmokingPsychotherapy, BriefRewardStudentsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26191947
PMCPMC4579003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.