ArticleTobacco regulatory science2015
Public Health Effects of Restricting Retail Tobacco Product Displays and Ads.
Article in Tobacco regulatory science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identifying best modelling practices for tobacco control policy simulations: a systematic review and a novel quality assessment framework.Tobacco control · 2023Pooled it
- Age Restricted Location Policies: A Potential Strategy for Advancing the Tobacco Endgame.American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Comparison of smoking prevalence in Canada before and after nicotine vaping product access using the SimSmoke model.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2023Article
- Follow the money: a closer look at US tobacco industry marketing expenditures.Tobacco control · 2023Article
- Linking Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) data to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC): The case for Tunisia.Tobacco induced diseases · 2022Article
- Altria-Juul Labs deal: why did it occur and what does it mean for the US nicotine delivery product market.Tobacco control · 2020Article
- Characteristics of storefront tobacco advertisements and differences by product type: A content analysis of retailers in New York City, USA.Preventive medicine · 2019Article
- An Economic Analysis of the Pre-Deeming US Market for Nicotine Vaping Products.Tobacco regulatory science · 2019Article
- The US Cigarette Industry: An Economic and Marketing Perspective.Tobacco regulatory science · 2019Article
- The US SimSmoke tobacco control policy model of smokeless tobacco and cigarette use.BMC public health · 2018Article
- Potential deaths averted in USA by replacing cigarettes with e-cigarettes.Tobacco control · 2018Article
- The Effect of Tobacco Control Policies on US Smokeless Tobacco Use: A Structured Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017Review
- Impact on smoking of England's 2012 partial tobacco point of sale display ban: a repeated cross-sectional national study.Tobacco control · 2017Article
- A framework for evaluating the public health impact of e-cigarettes and other vaporized nicotine products.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2017Review
- Global tobacco prevention and control in relation to a cardiovascular health promotion and disease prevention framework: A narrative review.Preventive medicine · 2016Review
- The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence: results from the Michigan SimSmoke tobacco policy simulation model.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2016Article
- Global Evidence on the Association between POS Advertising Bans and Youth Smoking Participation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016Article
- Complying with the framework convention for tobacco control: an application of the Abridged SimSmoke model to Israel.Israel journal of health policy research · 2016Article
- Regulating Tobacco Product Advertising and Promotions in the Retail Environment: A Roadmap for States and Localities.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo estimate the public health impact from restricting US retail point-of-sale (POS) tobacco product displays and advertising.
methodsBased on existing research, this paper estimates the effects on initiation and cessation rates from restricting POS tobacco product displays and ads in the US and uses the SimSmoke simulation model to project related smoking declines and health benefits.
resultsNew comprehensive POS restrictions are projected to reduce smoking prevalence by approximately 16% [range=3%-31%] relative to the status quo by 2065, preventing about 630,000 smoking-attributable deaths [range=108,000-1,225,000], 215,000 low birth weight births [range=33,000-421,000], 140,000 preterm births [range=22,000-271,000], and 1900 infant deaths from SIDSs [range=300-3800].
conclusionsFederal, state, or local action to restrict POS tobacco product displays and ads would contribute to a substantial reduction in smoking-attributed death and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.