Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26191506›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2015

Future Clinical Trials in DIPG: Bringing Epigenetics to the Clinic.

Andres Morales La Madrid, Rintaro Hashizume, Mark W Kieran

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Malignant Glioma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Bivalent Genes Targeting of Glioma Heterogeneity and Plasticity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andres Morales La MadridPediatric Neuro-Oncology, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu , Barcelona , Spain.
Rintaro HashizumeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University , Chicago, IL , USA ; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University , Chicago, IL , USA.
Mark W KieranPediatric Neuro-Oncology, Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital , Boston, MA , USA.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

Targeting histone demethylase activity for the treatment of pediatric brainstem gliomaR01NS093079 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI HASHIZUME, RINTARO · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS093079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of major recent advances in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) molecular characterization, this body of knowledge has not yet translated into better treatments. To date, more than 250 clinical trials evaluating radiotherapy along with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy as well as newer biologic agents have failed to improve the dismal outcome when compared to palliative radiation alone. The biology of DIPG remained unknown until recently when the neurosurgical expertise along with the recognition by the scientific and clinical community of the importance of tissue sampling at diagnosis; ideally, in the context of a clinical trial and by trained neurosurgical teams to maximize patient safety. These pre-treatment tumor samples, and others coming from tissue obtained post-mortem, have yielded new insights into DIPG molecular pathogenesis. We now know that DIPG comprises a heterogeneous disease with variable molecular phenotypes, different from adult high-grade glioma, other non-pontine pediatric high-grade gliomas, and even between pontine gliomas. The discovery of histone H3.3 or H3.1 mutations has been an important step forward in understanding tumor formation, maintenance, and progression. Pharmacologic reversal of DIPG histone demethylation therefore offers an important potential intervention strategy for the treatment of DIPG. To date, clinical trials of newly diagnosed or progressive DIPG with epigenetic (histone) modifiers have been unsuccessful. Whether this failure represents limited activity of the agents used, their CNS penetration, redundant pathways within the tumor, or the possibility that histone mutations are necessary only to initiate DIPGs but not maintain their growth, suggest that a great deal still needs to be elucidated in both the underlying biology of these pathways and the drugs designed to target them. In this review, we will discuss the role of both epigenetic and genetic mutations within DIPG and the development of treatment strategies directed against the unique abnormalities present in this disease.

Indexed as

childrenclinical trialsDIPGepigenetics

Identifiers

PMID26191506
PMCPMC4486770
OpenAlexW1494085100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.