Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26191382›Full record

ArticleToxicological research2015

Retinopathy Induced by Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Rats Assessed by Micro-computed Tomography and Histopathology.

Young Hee Kim, Kyung A Kwak, Tae Sung Kim, Ji Hyeon Seok, Hang Sik Roh, Jong-Kwon Lee, Jayoung Jeong, Eun Ho Meang, Jeong-Sup Hong, Yun Seok Lee and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Repeated-dose 90-day oral toxicity study of GST in Sprague-Dawley rats.Environmental analysis, health and toxicology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials to Eyes: An Important but Neglected Issue.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Young Hee KimDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Namseoul University, Cheonan, Korea.
Kyung A KwakDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Namseoul University, Cheonan, Korea.
Tae Sung KimToxicological Research Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Osong Health Technology Administration Complex, Cheongwon, Korea.
Ji Hyeon SeokToxicological Research Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Osong Health Technology Administration Complex, Cheongwon, Korea.
Hang Sik RohToxicological Research Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Osong Health Technology Administration Complex, Cheongwon, Korea.
Jong-Kwon LeeToxicological Research Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Osong Health Technology Administration Complex, Cheongwon, Korea.
Jayoung JeongToxicological Research Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Osong Health Technology Administration Complex, Cheongwon, Korea.
Eun Ho MeangHealth Care Research Laboratory, Korea Testing and Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
Jeong-Sup HongHealth Care Research Laboratory, Korea Testing and Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
Yun Seok LeeDepartment of Health Administration, Namseoul University, Cheonan, Korea.
Jin Seok KangDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Namseoul University, Cheonan, Korea.
Ministry of Food and Drug Safety · KRNamseoul University · KRKorea Testing & Research Institute · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnology has advanced at an extremely rapid pace over the past several years in numerous fields of research. However, the uptake of nanoparticles (NPs) into the body after administration through various routes may pose a risk to human health. In this study, we investigated the potential ocular toxicity of 20-nm, negatively- charged zinc oxide (ZnO) NPs in rats using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histopathological assessment. Animals were divided into four groups as control group, ZnO NPs treatment group (500 mg/kg/day), control recovery group, and ZnO NPs treatment and recovery group. Ocular samples were prepared from animals treated for 90 days (10 males and 10 females, respectively) and from recovery animals (5 males and 5 females, respectively) sacrificed at 14 days after final treatment and were compared to age-matched control animals. Micro-CT analyses represented the deposition and distribution of foreign materials in the eyes of rats treated with ZnO NPs, whereas control animals showed no such findings. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and energy dispersive spectrometry showed the intraocular foreign materials as zinc in treated rats, whereas control animals showed no zinc signal. Histopathological examination revealed the retinopathy in the eyes of rats treated with ZnO NPs. Neuronal nuclei expression was decreased in neurons of the ganglion cell layer of animals treated with ZnO NPs compared to the control group. Taken together, treatment with 20-nm, negatively-charged ZnO NPs increased retinopathy, associated with local distribution of them in ocular lesions.

Indexed as

HistopathologyMicro-CTNanoparticlesOcular toxicityZinc oxide

Identifiers

PMID26191382
PMCPMC4505346
OpenAlexW1039357448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.