Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26191347›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2015

Management of iatrogenic colorectal perforation: From surgery to endoscopy.

Shi-Lun Cai, Tao Chen, Li-Qing Yao, Yun-Shi Zhong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Constipation and colonoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Colonoscopic Perforations.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Peri-colonic haematoma following routine colonoscopy.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shi-Lun CaiShi-Lun Cai, Tao Chen, Li-Qing Yao, Yun-Shi Zhong, Endoscopic Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Tao ChenShi-Lun Cai, Tao Chen, Li-Qing Yao, Yun-Shi Zhong, Endoscopic Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Li-Qing YaoShi-Lun Cai, Tao Chen, Li-Qing Yao, Yun-Shi Zhong, Endoscopic Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yun-Shi ZhongShi-Lun Cai, Tao Chen, Li-Qing Yao, Yun-Shi Zhong, Endoscopic Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iatrogenic colon perforation is one the most pernicious complications for patients undergoing endoscopic screening or therapy. It is a serious but rare complication of colonoscopy. However, with the expansion of the indications for endoscopic therapies for gastrointestinal diseases, the frequency of colorectal perforation has increased. The management of iatrogenic colorectal perforation is still a challenge for many endoscopists. The methods for treating this complication vary, including conservative treatment, surgical treatment, laparoscopy and endoscopy. In this review, we highlight the etiology, recognition and treatment of colorectal iatrogenic perforation. Specifically, we shed light on the endoscopic management of this rare complication.

Indexed as

ColorectumEndoscopyIatrogenic perforationLaparoscopySurgery

Identifiers

PMID26191347
PMCPMC4501973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.