ReviewInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015
Intrahepatic bile duct adenoma (peribiliary gland hamartoma): a case report and review of literature.
Review in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Article
- Bile duct adenoma: rare benign liver tumour.Singapore medical journal · 2022Article
- Bile duct adenoma: imaging features and radiologic-pathologic correlation.Japanese journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Imaging features of intrahepatic bile duct adenoma in MRI.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Imaging features of bile duct adenoma: case series and review of literature.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bile duct adenoma (BDA) is a comparatively rare disease and there are relatively few reported cases in the English-language literature. Herein, we present a 63-year-old woman, who was incidentally found to have a liver-occupying lesion during a routine medical examination. Ultrasonography suggested "quick wash-in and wash-out" sign with an obvious nodular enhancement in the peripheral of the right intrahepatic nodular. Computed tomography revealed a 33 mm×25 mm×28 mm mass in the right hepatic segment. The patient underwent a liver tumor resection. Histological examination showed that the tumor was consisted of small heterogeneous tubular ducts with fibrous tissues and several inflammatory cells, without cell atypia and mitotic activity. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for CK19, CK7, CD56 and CD10. The final histopathological diagnosis was intrahepatic BDA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26191317PMC4503188W946101973What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.