ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015
Monitoring of cyclooxygenase-2 levels can predict EGFR mutations and the efficacy of EGFR-TKI in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concomitant Use of Analgesics and EGFR TKIs in Lung Cancer Patients: Outcomes and Perspectives From a Finnish Retrospective Register-Based Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- FLAIR-based radiomics signature from brain-tumor interface for early prediction of response to EGFR-TKI therapy in NSCLC patients with brain metastasis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Efficacy of vemurafenib in a heavy smoker with BRAF-mutated lung adenocarcinoma: A case report and literature review.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation detection has become a routine molecular test with significant implications for prognosis and therapeutic options of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, acquiring sufficient amounts of tissue for analyzing EGFR mutations is not often feasible, and not all the patients with sensitive EGFR mutations have benefit from EGFR-TKI treatment.
methodEGFR mutations were detected by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) in 44 patients of newly diagnosed lung adenocarcinoma, and patients with EGFR-positive mutations received EGFR-TKI treatment. The serum cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) levels were tested before EGFR-TKI treatment and on the 30th days after EGFR-TKI treatment.
resultsTwenty-nine cases were detected EGFR mutations. EGFR mutation rate of serum COX-2 high-level group was significantly higher than low-level group (92.9% vs. 53.3%, P=0.025). Multivariate analysis showed that serum COX-2 level was independently associated with EGFR mutation (P=0.033, OR=12.385, 95%CI, 1.231-124.567). Analysis of the correlation between clinical characteristics and the response of EGFR-TKI showed that the serum COX-2 high-level group had a better efficacy than low-level group (P=0.000), and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the serum COX-2 level was the independently influencing factor (P=0.004). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients of COX-2 high-level group have longer progression-free survival (PFS, P=0.013), and the Cox regression analysis showed that the same result (P=0.003; OR=0.980, 95% CI, 0.967-0.993).
conclusionThe serum COX-2 level seems to be closely associated with EGFR mutations in patients with Lung adenocarcinoma. The serum COX-2 level could help us to predict the responses of EGFR-TKI and the PFS in patients harboring EGFR mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26191267PMC4503138W2417892099What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.