ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015
Expression of XB130 in human ductal breast cancer.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Members of the miR-30 family inhibit the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of non-small-cell lung cancer cells by suppressing XB130 expression levels.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Article
- XB130 is overexpressed in prostate cancer and involved in cell growth and invasion.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- XB130 deficiency enhances lipopolysaccharide-induced septic response and acute lung injury.Oncotarget · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesXB130 is involved in gene regulation, cell proliferation, cell survival, cell migration, and tumorigenesis. In the present study, we first evaluated the expression of the XB130 and its prognostic significance in breast cancer. Then we evaluated whether XB130 could be a target for therapy in breast cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsImmunohistochemistry was used to assess the level of XB130 protein in surgically resected, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer specimens. Associations between XB130 and the postoperative prognosis of patients with breast cancer were evaluated. We evaluated the effect of XB130 inhibited by RNA interference on proliferation, invasion and apoptosis in vitro in a metastatic subclone of MCF-7 breast cancer cell line (LM-MCF-7). The effect of XB130 silencing alone or in combination with gemcitabine on LM-MCF-7 cells apoptosis was also investigated.
resultsXB130 protein was present in the cytoplasm of malignant cells, and not in the normal breast tissues. There was correlation between the presence of XB130 in tumour cells and lymph node status, tumor classification and clinical stage. XB130 expression level was significantly associated with recurrence-free and overall survival. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that positive XB130 was an independent risk factor for overall survival and recurrence free survival. XB130 silencing alone inhibits tumor growth and induces apoptosis in the LM-MCF-7 cells. Depletion of the XB130 in combination with gemcitabine resulted in marked apoptotic and necrotic cell death in LM-MCF-7 cells.
conclusionsXB130 could be useful as a prognostic marker of recurrence-free and overall survival in invasive breast cancer, as well as for the response to chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26191231PMC4503102W1013360934What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.