Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26191083›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2015

Altering cancer transcriptomes using epigenomic inhibitors.

Malaina Gaddis, Diana Gerrard, Seth Frietze, Peggy J Farnham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Regulatory effect of Wnt signaling on mitochondria in cancer: from mechanism to therapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025
    Review
  3. A Model of Butyrate Activity and Resistance in CRC.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Exon 3 mutations ofOncotarget · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malaina GaddisUSC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, 1450 Biggy Street, NRT 6503, Los Angeles, CA 90089-9601 USA.
Diana GerrardSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639 USA.
Seth FrietzeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639 USA.
Peggy J FarnhamUSC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, 1450 Biggy Street, NRT 6503, Los Angeles, CA 90089-9601 USA.
University of Northern Colorado · US

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Fumito Ito · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
Training in Genetic, Molecular and Cellular BiologyT32GM067587 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI STALLCUP, MICHAEL R · 2003 to 2012
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the hyper-activation of WNT signaling in a variety of cancer types, there has been a strong drive to develop pathway-specific inhibitors with the eventual goal of providing a chemotherapeutic antagonist of WNT signaling to cancer patients. A new category of drugs, called epigenetic inhibitors, are being developed that hold high promise for inhibition of the WNT pathway. The canonical WNT signaling pathway initiates when WNT ligands bind to receptors, causing the nuclear localization of the co-activator β-catenin (CTNNB1), which leads to an association of β-catenin with a member of the TCF transcription factor family at regulatory regions of WNT-responsive genes. The TCF/β-catenin complex then recruits CBP (CREBBP) or p300 (EP300), leading to histone acetylation and gene activation. A current model in the field is that CBP-driven expression of WNT target genes supports proliferation whereas p300-driven expression of WNT target genes supports differentiation. The small molecule inhibitor ICG-001 binds to CBP, but not to p300, and competitively inhibits the interaction of CBP with β-catenin. Upon treatment of cancer cells, this should reduce expression of CBP-regulated transcription, leading to reduced tumorigenicity and enhanced differentiation.

resultsWe have compared the genome-wide effects on the transcriptome after treatment with ICG-001 (the specific CBP inhibitor) versus C646, a compound that competes with acetyl-coA for the Lys-coA binding pocket of both CBP and p300. We found that both drugs cause large-scale changes in the transcriptome of HCT116 colon cancer cells and PANC1 pancreatic cancer cells and reverse some tumor-specific changes in gene expression. Interestingly, although the epigenetic inhibitors affect cell cycle pathways in both the colon and pancreatic cancer cell lines, the WNT signaling pathway was affected only in the colon cancer cells. Notably, WNT target genes were similarly downregulated after treatment of HCT116 with C646 as with ICG-001.

conclusionOur results suggest that treatment with a general HAT inhibitor causes similar effects on the transcriptome as does treatment with a CBP-specific inhibitor and that epigenetic inhibition affects the WNT pathway in HCT116 cells and the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway in PANC1 cells.

Indexed as

C646Cholesterol biosynthesisColon cancerEpigenetic inhibitorHistone acetylationICG-001Pancreatic cancerTCF7L2WNT signaling

Identifiers

PMID26191083
PMCPMC4506402
OpenAlexW1554178076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.