Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26190977›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroanatomy2015

Neuroanatomy goes viral!

Jonathan J Nassi, Constance L Cepko, Richard T Born, Kevin T Beier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Application of HSV-1 in Investigating Neurological Diseases.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Abortive and productive infection of CNS cell types following in vivo delivery of VSV.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Virus-Based Neural Circuit Tracing.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Viral Tools for Neural Circuit Tracing.Neuroscience bulletin · 2022
    Review
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan J NassiSystems Neurobiology Laboratories, Salk Institute for Biological Studies La Jolla, CA, USA.
Constance L CepkoDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA ; Department of Ophthalmology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA.
Richard T BornDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA ; Center for Brain Science, Harvard University Cambridge, MA, USA.
Kevin T BeierDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Department of Biology, Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Viral ModuleP30EY012196 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI Gabriel Kreiman · 1998 to 2026
$21.3M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY012196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nervous system is complex not simply because of the enormous number of neurons it contains but by virtue of the specificity with which they are connected. Unraveling this specificity is the task of neuroanatomy. In this endeavor, neuroanatomists have traditionally exploited an impressive array of tools ranging from the Golgi method to electron microscopy. An ideal method for studying anatomy would label neurons that are interconnected, and, in addition, allow expression of foreign genes in these neurons. Fortuitously, nature has already partially developed such a method in the form of neurotropic viruses, which have evolved to deliver their genetic material between synaptically connected neurons while largely eluding glia and the immune system. While these characteristics make some of these viruses a threat to human health, simple modifications allow them to be used in controlled experimental settings, thus enabling neuroanatomists to trace multi-synaptic connections within and across brain regions. Wild-type neurotropic viruses, such as rabies and alpha-herpes virus, have already contributed greatly to our understanding of brain connectivity, and modern molecular techniques have enabled the construction of recombinant forms of these and other viruses. These newly engineered reagents are particularly useful, as they can target genetically defined populations of neurons, spread only one synapse to either inputs or outputs, and carry instructions by which the targeted neurons can be made to express exogenous proteins, such as calcium sensors or light-sensitive ion channels, that can be used to study neuronal function. In this review, we address these uniquely powerful features of the viruses already in the neuroanatomist's toolbox, as well as the aspects of their biology that currently limit their utility. Based on the latter, we consider strategies for improving viral tracing methods by reducing toxicity, improving control of transsynaptic spread, and extending the range of species that can be studied.

Indexed as

expression vectorsneuroanatomyneurotropic virusreviewtranssynaptic tracing

Identifiers

PMID26190977
PMCPMC4486834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.