Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26190950›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2015

Improved Peptide and Protein Torsional Energetics with the OPLSAA Force Field.

Michael J Robertson, Julian Tirado-Rives, William L Jorgensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 316 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
316citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

316 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antibody-drug conjugate engineering: from design to efficacy and safety.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Effect of CuACS chemical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mapping Still Matters: Coarse-Graining with Machine Learning Potentials.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

256 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael J Robertson
Julian Tirado-Rives
William L Jorgensen

Funding

POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS FOR WATER PROTEIN INTERACTIONSR01GM032136 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JORGENSEN, WILLIAM L. · 1985 to 2023
$8.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM32136NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development and validation of new peptide dihedral parameters are reported for the OPLS-AA force field. High accuracy quantum chemical methods were used to scan φ, ψ, χ1, and χ2 potential energy surfaces for blocked dipeptides. New Fourier coefficients for the dihedral angle terms of the OPLS-AA force field were fit to these surfaces, utilizing a Boltzmann-weighted error function and systematically examining the effects of weighting temperature. To prevent overfitting to the available data, a minimal number of new residue-specific and peptide-specific torsion terms were developed. Extensive experimental solution-phase and quantum chemical gas-phase benchmarks were used to assess the quality of the new parameters, named OPLS-AA/M, demonstrating significant improvement over previous OPLS-AA force fields. A Boltzmann weighting temperature of 2000 K was determined to be optimal for fitting the new Fourier coefficients for dihedral angle parameters. Conclusions are drawn from the results for best practices for developing new torsion parameters for protein force fields.

Indexed as

Quantum TheoryTorsion, MechanicalAmino AcidsPeptidesProteinsTemperatureAmino AcidsPeptidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID26190950
PMCPMC4504185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.