Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26190851›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of preventive medicine2015

Confidentiality in Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review.

Anna W Brittain, Jessica R Williams, Lauren B Zapata, Susan B Moskosky, Tasmeen S Weik

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Internet-Based Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services Among Colombian Youth: A Cross-Sectional Study.Hispanic health care international : the official journal of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Trends in Emergency Contraceptive Use Among Adolescents and Young Adults, 2006-2017.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Confidentiality Matters but How Do We Improve Implementation in Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Care?The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna W BrittainDivision of Reproductive Health, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: abrittain@cdc.gov.
Jessica R WilliamsSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida; Manila Consulting Group, Inc., McLean, Virginia.
Lauren B ZapataDivision of Reproductive Health, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Susan B MoskoskyOffice of Population Affairs, USDHHS, Washington, District of Columbia.
Tasmeen S WeikOffice of Population Affairs, USDHHS, Washington, District of Columbia.
Manila Consulting Group (United States) · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextFamily planning services are essential for reducing high rates of unintended pregnancies among young people, yet a perception that providers will not preserve confidentiality may deter youth from accessing these services. This systematic review, conducted in 2011, summarizes the evidence on the effect of assuring confidentiality in family planning services to young people on reproductive health outcomes. The review was used to inform national recommendations on providing quality family planning services. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Multiple databases were searched to identify articles addressing confidentiality in family planning services to youth aged 10-24 years. Included studies were published from January 1985 through February 2011. Studies conducted outside the U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, or New Zealand, and those that focused exclusively on HIV or sexually transmitted diseases, were excluded. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The search strategy identified 19,332 articles, nine of which met the inclusion criteria. Four studies examined outcomes. Examined outcomes included use of clinical services and intention to use services. Of the four outcome studies, three found a positive association between assurance of confidentiality and at least one outcome of interest. Five studies provided information on youth perspectives and underscored the idea that young people greatly value confidentiality when receiving family planning services.

conclusionsThis review demonstrates that there is limited research examining whether confidentiality in family planning services to young people affects reproductive health outcomes. A robust research agenda is needed, given the importance young people place on confidentiality.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthConfidentialityHealth Services AccessibilityAdolescentAdultAustraliaCanadaChildEuropeFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMaleNew ZealandRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26190851
PMCPMC4579525
OpenAlexW986344398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.