Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26190847›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of preventive medicine2015

Impact of Reminder Systems in Clinical Settings to Improve Family Planning Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Lauren B Zapata, Stephen J Tregear, Marie Tiller, Karen Pazol, Nancy Mautone-Smith, Loretta E Gavin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Family Planning Reminder Systems: An Updated Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Does Postpartum Contraceptive Use Vary By Birth Intendedness?Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2018
    Article
  9. A systematic review on reminder systems in physical therapy.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Pregnancy and multiple sclerosis: Risk of unplanned pregnancy and drug exposure in utero.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren B ZapataDivision of Reproductive Health, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: lzapata@cdc.gov.
Stephen J TregearManila Consulting Group, Inc., McLean, Virginia.
Marie TillerManila Consulting Group, Inc., McLean, Virginia.
Karen PazolDivision of Reproductive Health, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Nancy Mautone-SmithOffice of Population Affairs, USDHHS, Rockville, Maryland.
Loretta E GavinOffice of Population Affairs, USDHHS, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThis systematic review evaluated the evidence on the impact of family planning reminder systems-interventions intended to remind patients of behaviors to achieve reproductive health goals (e.g., daily text messages reminding oral contraceptive [OC] users to take a pill)-to provide information to guide national recommendations on quality family planning services. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Multiple databases including PubMed were searched during 2010-2011 for peer-reviewed articles published in English from January 1985 through February 2011 describing studies evaluating reminder systems to improve family planning outcomes. Studies were excluded if they focused primarily on HIV or sexually transmitted infection prevention, focused solely on men, or were conducted outside the U.S., Europe, Australia, or New Zealand. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The initial search identified 16,129 articles, five of which met the inclusion criteria. Three studies examined the impact of OC reminder systems; two found a statistically significant positive impact on correct use. Two studies examined the impact of reminder systems among depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users; one found a statistically significant positive impact on correct use.

conclusionsAlthough mixed support was found for the effectiveness of reminder system interventions on correct use of OCs and DMPA, the highest-quality evidence yielded null findings. The evidence base would be strengthened by the development of additional studies, especially RCTs, which objectively measure outcomes, examine additional contraceptive methods, and have sufficient sample sizes to detect behavioral outcomes at least 12 months post-intervention.

Indexed as

ContraceptionAustraliaEuropeFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMaleNew ZealandPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedReminder SystemsText MessagingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26190847
PMCPMC4523063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.