Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26190844›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of preventive medicine2015

Systematic Review Evidence Methodology: Providing Quality Family Planning Services.

Stephen J Tregear, Loretta E Gavin, Jessica R Williams

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Family Planning Reminder Systems: An Updated Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Client Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Article
  19. Receipt of Selected Preventive Health Services for Women and Men of Reproductive Age - United States, 2011-2013.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen J TregearManila Consulting Group, Inc., Falls Church, Virginia. Electronic address: tregear_stephen@bah.com.
Loretta E GavinOffice of Population Affairs, USDHHS, Washington, District of Columbia.
Jessica R WilliamsSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From 2010 to 2014, CDC and the Office of Population Affairs at the USDHHS collaborated on the development of clinical recommendations for providing quality family planning services. A high priority was placed on the use of existing scientific evidence in developing the recommendations, in accordance with IOM guidelines for how to develop "trustworthy" clinical practice guidelines. Consequently, a series of systematic reviews were developed using a transparent and reproducible methodology aimed at ensuring that the clinical practice guidelines would be based on evidence collected in the most unbiased manner possible. This article describes the methodology used in conducting these systematic reviews, which occurred from mid-2011 through 2012.

Indexed as

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Evidence-Based MedicineFamily Planning ServicesHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicUnited StatesUnited States Dept. of Health and Human Services

Identifiers

PMID26190844
PMCPMC10472447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.