Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26190359›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

An oral care self-management support protocol (OrCaSS) to reduce oral mucositis in hospitalized patients with acute myeloid leukemia and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Lynn Leppla, Sabina De Geest, Katharina Fierz, Barbara Deschler-Baier, Antje Koller

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Systematic review of basic oral care for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients and clinical practice guidelines.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Species distribution and susceptibility profiles of oral candidiasis in hematological malignancy and solid tumor patients.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Oncology nursing practices in the management of chemotherapy-related oral mucositis in accordance with evidence-based guidelines: a descriptive and cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lynn LepplaInstitute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Sabina De GeestInstitute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland. Sabina.DeGeest@unibas.ch.
Katharina FierzInstitute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Barbara Deschler-BaierDepartment of Oncology, Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetterstrasse 55, Freiburg, 79106, Germany.
Antje KollerInstitute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel · CHUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOral mucositis (OM) is a common and debilitating side effect of chemoradiotherapy in patients awaiting allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). PURPOSE: The aim of this pilot RCT was to compare an oral care self-management support protocol (OrCaSS) to usual pre-aHSCT care. Feasibility was tested, effect sizes calculated for OM (primary outcome), and patient adherence was measured (secondary outcome).

methodsEighteen AML patients awaiting aHSCT and hospitalized between August 2012 and April 2013 were randomized 1:1 to usual care (UCG) and intervention (IG) groups. The OrCaSS protocol consisted of two sessions of educational and behavioral interventions, the first delivered 1 week pre-admission (T1), the second on admission day (T2). Via field notes, practicability and acceptability were evaluated to explore the feasibility of intervention and study procedures. OM data were collected at T1, T2, and daily for 28 days using the WHO scale. The effect size r was calculated (r less than -0.1 ≙ small and greater than or equal to -0.3 ≙ medium). Patients' adherence to the protocol was assessed at T1, T2, and 8-10 days post-HSCT (T3).

resultsResearch and intervention procedures were feasible. OM incidence was 100 %. The IG's median highest OM grade was 2.0 (IQR = 2); the UCGs was 3.0 (IQR = 2; r = -0.1). Median OM durations were 12 days in the IG and 14 days in the UCG (r = -0.1). OM onset was 2 days later in the IG than in the UCG (r = -0.1). Over the course of the study, patient adherence decreased in both groups.

conclusionsOrCaSS is a promising intervention to delay and reduce OM. These results can serve to plan a larger RCT.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSelf CareStomatitisTransplantation, HomologousTreatment OutcomeAllogeneic stem cell transplantationOral care protocolOral mucositis

Identifiers

PMID26190359
OpenAlexW987623705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.