ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2010
Novel perspectives in probiotic treatment: the efficacy and unveiled mechanisms of the physiological functions.
Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probiotic treatments for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel diseases: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- The Complex Role of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Food Detoxification.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Searching the H. pylori; serology & PCR in children with adenoid hypertrophy and rhino sinusitis: a cross sectional study, Tehran, Iran.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probiotics are defined as "live microorganisms which confer a health benefit on the host" when administered in adequate amounts, and have potential effects for maintaining intestinal development, nutrition, and treating intestinal inflammations, functional disorders, and other extra-intestinal diseases. Although the benefits of probiotics for human health were first noted over 100 years ago, the analysis of probiotic functions began in earnest only 20 years ago. Probiotics, such as some strains of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Escherichia coli, and Bacillus subtilis, inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria, induce competitive effects for the adherent of pathogenic bacteria and their toxins to intestinal epithelia, induce cytoprotective heat shock proteins, enhance the intestinal barrier function, and modulate the host immune responses. The crosstalk between the host and the probiotics appears to be mediated by bacteria-derived effectors, which can be sensed with multiple systems, including the Toll-like receptors and cell membrane transporters. Future analyses will identify more probiotic-derived effectors, the recognition mechanisms of these effectors, and the subsequent changes of the intestinal epithelia and immune cells for each probiotic treatment. For clinical use, a procedure that objectively evaluates the ability of each probiotic effect will help establish a standard for choosing the most valuable strain and its proper dose for each individual patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.