Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26189978›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2015

Medication taking behaviors among breast cancer patients on adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Gretchen Kimmick, Sara N Edmond, Hayden B Bosworth, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Paul K Marcom, Kimberly Blackwell, Francis J Keefe, Rebecca A Shelby

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gretchen KimmickDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3204, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: gretchen.kimmick@duke.edu.
Sara N EdmondDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, USA.
Hayden B BosworthDepartment of Medicine, Psychiatry, and School of Nursing, Duke University Medical Center; Center for Health Services Research, Durham VAMC, USA.
Jeffrey PeppercornDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3204, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Paul K MarcomDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3204, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Kimberly BlackwellDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3204, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Francis J KeefeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, USA.
Rebecca A ShelbyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Improving Adherence to Recommended Surveillance in Breast Cancer SurvivorsK07CA138767 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SHELBY, REBECCA A · 2010 to 2014
$788k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA138767NCI NIH HHS K07CA138767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore how symptoms and psychosocial factors are related to intentional and unintentional non-adherent medication taking behaviors.

methodsIncluded were postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive, stage I-IIIA breast cancer, who had completed surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, and were taking endocrine therapy. Self-administered, standardized measures were completed during a routine clinic visit: Brief Fatigue Inventory, Brief Pain Inventory, Menopause Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General and Neurotoxicity scales, and Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale. Regression analyses were performed to determine the degree to which demographic, medical, symptom, and psychosocial variables, explain intentional, such as changing one's doses or stopping medication, and unintentional, such as forgetting to take one's medication, non-adherent behaviors.

resultsParticipants were 112 women: mean age 64 (SD = 9) years; 81% white; mean time from surgery 40 (SD = 28) months; 49% received chemotherapy (39% including a taxane); mean time on endocrine therapy, 35 (SD = 29.6) months; 82% taking an aromatase inhibitor. Intentional and unintentional non-adherent behaviors were described in 33.9% and 58.9% of participants, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that higher self-efficacy for taking medication was associated with lower levels of unintentional (p = 0.002) and intentional (p = 0.004) non-adherent behaviors. The presence of symptoms (p = 0.03) and lower self-efficacy for physician communication (p = 0.009) were associated with higher levels of intentional non-adherent behaviors.

conclusionsThese results suggest that women who report greater symptoms, lower self-efficacy for communicating with their physician, and lower self-efficacy for taking their medication are more likely to engage in both intentional and unintentional non-adherent behaviors.

Indexed as

Self EfficacyAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCommunicationDrug MonitoringFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsPilot ProjectsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsAdherenceBreast cancerEndocrine therapySelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID26189978
PMCPMC4824055
OpenAlexW1844393607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.