ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2015
Decoding NF1 Intragenic Copy-Number Variations.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein domain-specific genotype-phenotype correlation study of neurofibromatosis type 1.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a patient with neurofibromatosis type I presenting with anemia: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- R-loops as a trigger for intra- and extrachromosomal DNA amplification in cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Epigenetic Gene-Regulatory Loci in Alu Elements Associated with Autism Susceptibility in the Prefrontal Cortex of ASD.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Identification of Novel and RecurrentGenes · 2022Article
- SvAnna: efficient and accurate pathogenicity prediction of coding and regulatory structural variants in long-read genome sequencing.Genome medicine · 2022Article
- Replication stress at microsatellites causes DNA double-strand breaks and break-induced replication.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Article
- H. pylori infection alters repair of DNA double-strand breaks via SNHG17.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2020Article
- Xq22 deletions and correlation with distinct neurological disease traits in females: Further evidence for a contiguous gene syndrome.Human mutation · 2020Article
- Deletion of exon 4 in LAMA2 is the most frequent mutation in Chinese patients with laminin α2-related muscular dystrophy.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Alternative outcomes of pathogenic complex somatic structural variations in the genomes of NF1 and NF2 patients.Neurogenetics · 2017Article
- Inter-Fork Strand Annealing causes genomic deletions during the termination of DNA replication.eLife · 2017Article
- Missing genetic variations in GNE myopathy: rearrangement hotspots encompassing 5'UTR and founder allele.Journal of human genetics · 2017Article
- PMS2 inactivation by a complex rearrangement involving an HERV retroelement and the inverted 100-kb duplicon on 7p22.1.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016Article
- A polymorphic Alu insertion that mediates distinct disease-associated deletions.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016Article
- Mechanisms underlying structural variant formation in genomic disorders.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic rearrangements can cause both Mendelian and complex disorders. Currently, several major mechanisms causing genomic rearrangements, such as non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), fork stalling and template switching (FoSTeS), and microhomology-mediated break-induced replication (MMBIR), have been proposed. However, to what extent these mechanisms contribute to gene-specific pathogenic copy-number variations (CNVs) remains understudied. Furthermore, few studies have resolved these pathogenic alterations at the nucleotide-level. Accordingly, our aim was to explore which mechanisms contribute to a large, unique set of locus-specific non-recurrent genomic rearrangements causing the genetic neurocutaneous disorder neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Through breakpoint-spanning PCR as well as array comparative genomic hybridization, we have identified the breakpoints in 85 unrelated individuals carrying an NF1 intragenic CNV. Furthermore, we characterized the likely rearrangement mechanisms of these 85 CNVs, along with those of two additional previously published NF1 intragenic CNVs. Unlike the most typical recurrent rearrangements mediated by flanking low-copy repeats (LCRs), NF1 intragenic rearrangements vary in size, location, and rearrangement mechanisms. We propose the DNA-replication-based mechanisms comprising both FoSTeS and/or MMBIR and serial replication stalling to be the predominant mechanisms leading to NF1 intragenic CNVs. In addition to the loop within a 197-bp palindrome located in intron 40, four Alu elements located in introns 1, 2, 3, and 50 were also identified as intragenic-rearrangement hotspots within NF1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.