Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26189090›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2015

Probing the structural dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids with optical tweezers.

Dustin B Ritchie, Michael T Woodside

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Universal cold RNA phase transitions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Protein Nanomechanics.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Stem-loop formation drives RNA folding in mechanical unzipping experiments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dustin B RitchieDepartment of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2E1 Canada.
Michael T WoodsideDepartment of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2E1 Canada; National Institute for Nanotechnology, National Research Council, Edmonton, AB T6G2M9, Canada. Electronic address: Michael.Woodside@ualberta.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conformational changes are an essential feature of most molecular processes in biology. Optical tweezers have emerged as a powerful tool for probing conformational dynamics at the single-molecule level because of their high resolution and sensitivity, opening new windows on phenomena ranging from folding and ligand binding to enzyme function, molecular machines, and protein aggregation. By measuring conformational changes induced in a molecule by forces applied by optical tweezers, new insight has been gained into the relationship between dynamics and function. We discuss recent advances from studies of how structure forms in proteins and RNA, including non-native structures, fluctuations in disordered proteins, and interactions with chaperones assisting native folding. We also review the development of assays probing the dynamics of complex protein-nucleic acid and protein-protein assemblies that reveal the dynamic interactions between biomolecular machines and their substrates.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularMolecular ConformationOptical TweezersIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsNucleic Acid ConformationNucleic AcidsProtein Aggregation, PathologicalProtein FoldingProteinsProtein UnfoldingRNAStructure-Activity RelationshipIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsNucleic AcidsProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID26189090
PMCPMC7126019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.