Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26189007›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2016

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of the Oral Absorption Process and Explaining Intra-Subject Variability in Plasma Exposures of Imatinib in Healthy Volunteers.

Ali-Akbar Golabchifar, Saeed Rezaee, Nahid Mobarghei Dinan, Abbas Kebriaeezadeh, Mohammad-Reza Rouini

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A computational dynamic model of combination treatment for type II inhibitors with asciminib.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ali-Akbar GolabchifarBiopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetic Division, Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 14155-651, Iran.
Saeed RezaeeDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Nahid Mobarghei DinanBiopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetic Division, Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 14155-651, Iran.
Abbas KebriaeezadehDepartment of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad-Reza RouiniBiopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetic Division, Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 14155-651, Iran. rouini@tums.ac.ir.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRZanjan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveImatinib mesylate is presently the first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The aim of this study was to investigate the absorption and distribution kinetics of imatinib in healthy Iranian volunteers using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NLMEM) to assess the overall, intra- and inter-subject variabilities in pharmacokinetic parameters after oral administration.

methodsThis analysis was based on data from 24 healthy subjects who participated in a bioequivalence study after administering a single dose of 200 mg of each formulation. Imatinib concentrations were quantified using a validated liquid chromatography method. To simultaneously describe the imatinib pharmacokinetic profiles obtained with both formulations, a population pharmacokinetic model was applied to data using SAEM algorithm implemented in MONOLIX, whilst simulations were used by numerical solving of ordinary differential equations to calculate secondary parameters in individuals for bioequivalence studies.

resultsAccording to goodness-of-fit criteria, a two-compartment open model with sequential zero- then first-order absorption and first-order elimination was used as the structural pharmacokinetic model. Inter-individual variability (IIV) was considered for all parameters. Typical population estimates (% IIV) were fraction of the drug absorbed with a zero-order kinetic (Fr) of 0.153 (47.9 %) in period (Tk0) of 0.714 h (47.4 %), first-order absorption rate constant (k a) of 0.94 h(-1)(31.2 %), oral clearance of 19 L/h (27.9 %), central volume of distribution (V c/F) of 139 L (21.5 %), apparent peripheral volume of distribution (V p/F) of 130 L (29.7 %) and the apparent inter-compartment clearance (Q/F) of 29.6 L/h (41.8 %). Body mass index (BMI) was the only covariate found to significantly affect V p /F. The coefficient of variation for intra-individual plasma exposure (AUC0-∞) was 27.8 %.

conclusionsAnalyses using NLMEM for imatinib exhibited absorption complexities such as two input rates and medium to high intra-individual variability in drug exposure.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAntineoplastic AgentsCross-Over StudiesFemaleGastrointestinal AbsorptionHealthy VolunteersHumansImatinib MesylateIranKineticsLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedPlasmaTherapeutic EquivalencyAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib Mesylate

Identifiers

PMID26189007
OpenAlexW1044109370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.