Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26189001›Full record

ArticlePlanta2015

Differences in light-harvesting, acclimation to growth-light environment, and leaf structural development between Swedish and Italian ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Jared J Stewart, William W Adams, Christopher M Cohu, Stephanie K Polutchko, Elizabeth M Lombardi, Barbara Demmig-Adams

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A large-effect fitness trade-off across environments is explained by a single mutation affecting cold acclimation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Distinct Cold Acclimation of Productivity Traits inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Growth and Essential Carotenoid Micronutrients inFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jared J StewartDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309-0334, USA.
William W AdamsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309-0334, USA.
Christopher M CohuDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309-0334, USA.
Stephanie K PolutchkoDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309-0334, USA.
Elizabeth M LombardiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309-0334, USA.
Barbara Demmig-AdamsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309-0334, USA. barbara.demmig-adams@colorado.edu.
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionLeaf morphological differences have an impact on light distribution within the leaf, photosynthesis, and photoprotection in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes from near the limits of this species' latitudinal distribution in Europe. Leaf morphology, photosynthesis, and photoprotection were characterized in two Arabidopsis ecotypes from near the limits of this species' latitudinal distribution in Europe (63°N and 42°N). The Swedish ecotype formed thicker leaves and upregulated photosynthesis more substantially than the Italian ecotype in high-light environments. Conversely, the smaller rosette formed, and lesser aboveground biomass accumulated, by the Swedish versus the Italian ecotype in low growth-light environments is consistent with a lesser shade tolerance of the Swedish ecotype. The response of the thinner leaves of the Italian ecotype to evenly spaced daily periods of higher light against a background of otherwise non-fluctuating low light was to perform the same rate of photosynthesis with less chlorophyll, rather than exhibiting greater rates of photosynthesis. In contrast, the thicker leaves of the Swedish ecotype showed elevated photosynthetic performance in response to daily supplemental higher light periods in a low-light growth environment. These findings suggest significant self-shading in the lower depths of leaves of the Swedish ecotype by the chloroplasts residing in the upper portions of the leaf, resulting in a requirement for higher incident light to trigger photosynthetic upregulation in the lower portions of its thicker leaves. Conversely, photoprotective responses in the Italian ecotype suggest that more excess light penetrated into the lower depths of this ecotype's leaves. It is speculated that light absorption and the degree of utilization of this absorbed light inform cellular signaling networks that orchestrate leaf structural development, which, in turn, affects light distribution and the level of absorbed versus photosynthetically utilized light in a leaf.

Indexed as

EcotypeLightAcclimatizationArabidopsisPhotosynthesisSpecies SpecificityZeaxanthinsZeaxanthinsLeaf thicknessLight responseNPQPhotosynthesisTocopherolZeaxanthin

Identifiers

PMID26189001
OpenAlexW1923932177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.