Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26188650›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2015

Complications of low compared to standard pneumoperitoneum pressures in laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic pathology: a systematic review protocol.

Esther B Kyle, Sarah Maheux-Lacroix, Amélie Boutin, Madeleine Lemyre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Low vs Standard Pressures in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: a Systematic Review.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Esther B KyleCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 2705, boulevard Laurier, Québec, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada. esther.b-kyle.1@ulaval.ca.
Sarah Maheux-LacroixCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 2705, boulevard Laurier, Québec, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada. sarah.maheux-lacroix.1@ulaval.ca.
Amélie BoutinDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, 2325, rue de l'Université, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. amelie.boutin.2@ulaval.ca.
Madeleine LemyreCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 2705, boulevard Laurier, Québec, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada. madeleine.lemyre@fmed.ulaval.ca.
Université Laval · CAWilfrid Laurier University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo definite consensus has been established about the optimal pressure for artificial pneumoperitoneum when performing laparoscopic surgery. It has been postulated that lowering intra-peritoneal pressure levels while performing general laparoscopic surgery would lower surgical complications including post-operative pain, but data remain scarce about significant operative complications. Furthermore, such data is not available for gynecologic laparoscopy. The objective of this systematic review is to compare the frequency and nature of significant operative complications of lower and standard pneumoperiteoneal pressure levels in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery for benign indications. METHODS/

designWe will search PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, randomised control trials registries, and reference lists of included articles. Randomised controlled trials comparing different intra-peritoneal pressure levels in women undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery for a non-malignant indication will be eligible. Two reviewers will independently select and review references, extract data, and assess quality from included studies. We will use RevMan5 to calculate risk ratios and their 95 % confidence intervals to compare the frequency of complications according to intra-peritoneal pressure levels. We will perform sensitivity analyses to explore heterogeneity potentially due to various operative characteristics or characteristics of patients. DISCUSSION: Our results will help identify the optimal intra-peritoneal pressure level in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery and determine if lowering intra-peritoneal pressure levels while trying to achieve lower levels of post-operative pain is an acceptable change of practice according to the frequency and nature of significant complications. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42015020231.

Indexed as

AbdomenClinical ProtocolsFemaleGynecologyHumansLaparoscopyPneumoperitoneum, ArtificialPostoperative PainPressureResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26188650
PMCPMC4506768
OpenAlexW1566919720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.