Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26188274›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2015

Standardizing data exchange for clinical research protocols and case report forms: An assessment of the suitability of the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) Operational Data Model (ODM).

Vojtech Huser, Chandan Sastry, Matthew Breymaier, Asma Idriss, James J Cimino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical Research Informatics: a Decade-in-Review.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluating the Coverage of the HL7AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vojtech HuserLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States. Electronic address: vojtech.huser@nih.gov.
Chandan SastryNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Matthew BreymaierNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Asma IdrissNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
James J CiminoLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States; Laboratory for Informatics Development, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

Clinical & Research InformaticsZIHHD008868 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI IDRISS, ASMA · 2009 to 2025
$87.4M
Improving the Clinical Research Informatics and Clinical Bioinformatics Infrastructure at the NIH Clinical CenterZIACL000907 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI HUSER, VOJTECH · 2014 to 2014
$0k
Improving the Clinical Research Informatics and Clinical Bioinformatics Infrastructure at the NIH Clinical CenterZIHCL000907 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI HUSER, VOJTECH · 2015 to 2015
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CL000907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient communication of a clinical study protocol and case report forms during all stages of a human clinical study is important for many stakeholders. An electronic and structured study representation format that can be used throughout the whole study life-span can improve such communication and potentially lower total study costs. The most relevant standard for representing clinical study data, applicable to unregulated as well as regulated studies, is the Operational Data Model (ODM) in development since 1999 by the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC). ODM's initial objective was exchange of case report forms data but it is increasingly utilized in other contexts. An ODM extension called Study Design Model, introduced in 2011, provides additional protocol representation elements. Using a case study approach, we evaluated ODM's ability to capture all necessary protocol elements during a complete clinical study lifecycle in the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health. ODM offers the advantage of a single format for institutions that deal with hundreds or thousands of concurrent clinical studies and maintain a data warehouse for these studies. For each study stage, we present a list of gaps in the ODM standard and identify necessary vendor or institutional extensions that can compensate for such gaps. The current version of ODM (1.3.2) has only partial support for study protocol and study registration data mainly because it is outside the original development goal. ODM provides comprehensive support for representation of case report forms (in both the design stage and with patient level data). Inclusion of requirements of observational, non-regulated or investigator-initiated studies (outside Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation) can further improve future revisions of the standard.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchClinical ProtocolsInformation DisseminationHumansInformation SystemsSoftwareClinical protocolClinical research informaticsClinical trialelectronic Case Report FormsStandards

Identifiers

PMID26188274
PMCPMC4714951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.