ArticleNeuro-oncology2016
Imaging patterns predict patient survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma via machine learning techniques.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
159 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 308 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of artificial intelligence in forecasting survival in high-grade glioma: systematic review and meta-analysis involving 79,638 participants.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Reproducibility analysis of multi-institutional paired expert annotations and radiomic features of the Ivy Glioblastoma Atlas Project (Ivy GAP) dataset.Medical physics · 2020Pooled it
- The role of imaging for the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline update.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Machine learning applications to clinical decision support in neurosurgery: an artificial intelligence augmented systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2020Pooled it
- Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and radiogenomic biomarkers for glioma characterisation: a systematic review.The British journal of radiology · 2018Pooled it
- Radiomics-Based Machine Learning for Outcome Prediction in a Multicenter Phase II Study of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibition Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022Trial
- Deep learning features from diffusion tensor imaging improve glioma stratification and identify risk groups with distinct molecular pathway activities.EBioMedicine · 2021Trial
- Prognostic prediction of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage using CT radiomics and machine learning.Brain and behavior · 2021Trial
- Quantitative imaging biomarkers for risk stratification of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab.Neuro-oncology · 2017Trial
- Machine Learning-Driven Metabolomic Biomarker Discovery in Glioblastoma: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Intratumoral preservation of the stem-like malignant cell proportion in glioblastoma, prognostic impact, and its radiomethylomic signatures.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in cancer: applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- PHSP-Net: Personalized Habitat-Aware Deep Learning for Multi-Center Glioblastoma Survival Prediction Using Multiparametric MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Prognostic Stratification of Patients With Glioblastoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025Article
- WMRCA + : a weighted majority rule-based clustering method for cancer subtype prediction using metabolic gene sets.Hereditas · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prognostic subgrouping of glioblastoma: A multicenter study.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Predictive modeling with linear machine learning can estimate glioblastoma survival in months based solely on MGMT-methylation status, age and sex.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Scoping review of image-based overall survival prediction in glioma using machine learning.Polish journal of radiology · 2025Review
- A critical assessment of artificial intelligence in magnetic resonance imaging of cancer.Npj imaging · 2025Review
- Radiomic Consensus Clustering in Glioblastoma and Association with Gene Expression Profiles.Cancers · 2024Article
99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMRI characteristics of brain gliomas have been used to predict clinical outcome and molecular tumor characteristics. However, previously reported imaging biomarkers have not been sufficiently accurate or reproducible to enter routine clinical practice and often rely on relatively simple MRI measures. The current study leverages advanced image analysis and machine learning algorithms to identify complex and reproducible imaging patterns predictive of overall survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma (GB).
methodsOne hundred five patients with GB were first used to extract approximately 60 diverse features from preoperative multiparametric MRIs. These imaging features were used by a machine learning algorithm to derive imaging predictors of patient survival and molecular subtype. Cross-validation ensured generalizability of these predictors to new patients. Subsequently, the predictors were evaluated in a prospective cohort of 29 new patients.
resultsSurvival curves yielded a hazard ratio of 10.64 for predicted long versus short survivors. The overall, 3-way (long/medium/short survival) accuracy in the prospective cohort approached 80%. Classification of patients into the 4 molecular subtypes of GB achieved 76% accuracy.
conclusionsBy employing machine learning techniques, we were able to demonstrate that imaging patterns are highly predictive of patient survival. Additionally, we found that GB subtypes have distinctive imaging phenotypes. These results reveal that when imaging markers related to infiltration, cell density, microvascularity, and blood-brain barrier compromise are integrated via advanced pattern analysis methods, they form very accurate predictive biomarkers. These predictive markers used solely preoperative images, hence they can significantly augment diagnosis and treatment of GB patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.