Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26187992›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2015

FANCD2 and REV1 cooperate in the protection of nascent DNA strands in response to replication stress.

Yeran Yang, Zhenbo Liu, Fengli Wang, Piya Temviriyanukul, Xiaolu Ma, Yingfeng Tu, Lingna Lv, Yu-Fen Lin, Min Huang, Ting Zhang and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Yeran YangKey Laboratory of Genomics and Precision Medicine, China Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Center, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Zhenbo LiuKey Laboratory of Genomics and Precision Medicine, China Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Center, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Fengli WangState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Piya TemviriyanukulDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Xiaolu MaKey Laboratory of Genomics and Precision Medicine, China Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Center, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Yingfeng TuState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Lingna LvKey Laboratory of Genomics and Precision Medicine, China Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Center, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Yu-Fen LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Min HuangKey Laboratory of Genomics and Precision Medicine, China Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Center, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Ting ZhangKey Laboratory of Genomics and Precision Medicine, China Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Center, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Huadong PeiBeijing Proteome Research Center, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing 102206, China.
Benjamin P C ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Jacob G JansenDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Niels de WindDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Paula L FischhaberDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University Northridge, Northridge, CA 91330-8262, USA.
Errol C FriedbergDepartment of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Tie-Shan TangState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China tangtsh@ioz.ac.cn.
Caixia GuoKey Laboratory of Genomics and Precision Medicine, China Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Center, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China guocx@big.ac.cn.
Beijing Institute of Genomics · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNLeiden University Medical Center · NLBeijing Proteome Research Center · CNCalifornia State University, Northridge · USSouthwestern Medical CenterSouthwestern Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

REV1 is a eukaryotic member of the Y-family of DNA polymerases involved in translesion DNA synthesis and genome mutagenesis. Recently, REV1 is also found to function in homologous recombination. However, it remains unclear how REV1 is recruited to the sites where homologous recombination is processed. Here, we report that loss of mammalian REV1 results in a specific defect in replication-associated gene conversion. We found that REV1 is targeted to laser-induced DNA damage stripes in a manner dependent on its ubiquitin-binding motifs, on RAD18, and on monoubiquitinated FANCD2 (FANCD2-mUb) that associates with REV1. Expression of a FANCD2-Ub chimeric protein in RAD18-depleted cells enhances REV1 assembly at laser-damaged sites, suggesting that FANCD2-mUb functions downstream of RAD18 to recruit REV1 to DNA breaks. Consistent with this suggestion we found that REV1 and FANCD2 are epistatic with respect to sensitivity to the double-strand break-inducer camptothecin. REV1 enrichment at DNA damage stripes also partially depends on BRCA1 and BRCA2, components of the FANCD2/BRCA supercomplex. Intriguingly, analogous to FANCD2-mUb and BRCA1/BRCA2, REV1 plays an unexpected role in protecting nascent replication tracts from degradation by stabilizing RAD51 filaments. Collectively these data suggest that REV1 plays multiple roles at stalled replication forks in response to replication stress.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA ReplicationCamptothecinCell LineDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseFanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 ProteinGene ConversionHumansNuclear ProteinsNucleotidyltransferasesProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsStress, PhysiologicalTopoisomerase I InhibitorsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesCamptothecinDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseFanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 ProteinNuclear ProteinsNucleotidyltransferasesRAD18 protein, humanREV1 protein, humanRev1 protein, mouseTopoisomerase I InhibitorsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesY-Family DNA Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID26187992
PMCPMC4787816
OpenAlexW1879251385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.