Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2015
Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, phase 2 trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 332 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Timing of Rectal Cancer Response to Chemoradiation
Effect of Concurrent Capecitabine-based Long-term Radiotherapy Followed by 4 Cycles XELOX Pre- a Delayed TME Compared With 6 Cycles XELOX post-a Regular Timing TME in Patients With High Risk Rectal Cancer: a Multi-centers, Randomized, Open-Label Trial
Rectal Microbiome Variability Among Rectal Cancer Cohorts Including Complete Clinical Responders, Pathologic Responders, and Early Recurrence
A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of the Clinical Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Therapy Based on Organoids Drug Sensitivity Versus Empirical Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Advanced Rectal Cancer
Efficacy and Safety of Adaptive Boost Radiotherapy to Primary Lesions and Positive Nodes in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Phase III Trial
Total Neoadjuvant Treatment With or Without Tislelizumab for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: An Open-label Randomized Controlled Phase II Study (The TOTAL Trial)
Who cites it
332 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Compliance and Toxicity of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Optimal choice of different neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapies for locally advanced rectal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Pooled it
- The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer, 2024 update.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025Guideline
- Curative-Intended Management of Synchronous Esophageal and Rectal Cancer-A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Mucinous histology is a negative predictor of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Pooled it
- Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the Era of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Total neoadjuvant therapy based on short-course radiotherapy versus standard long-course chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Treatment stratification and prognosis assessment using circulating tumor DNA in locally advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy before Surgery for Treating Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Pooled it
- Does a long interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery benefit the clinical outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer? A systematic review and meta analyses.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Pooled it
- Preoperative short-course radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy for treatment with locally advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2021Pooled it
- Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) versus Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The oncologist · 2021Pooled it
- Preoperative MRI assessment of rectal cancer for predicting metastasis-free survival-a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial.European radiology · 2026Trial
- Minimum 18-week chemotherapy improves survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiotherapy: a post hoc analysis of the STELLAR trial.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with or without PD-1 blockade in locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial.Nature medicine · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of MR-guided adaptive simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy to primary lesions and positive lymph nodes in the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomized controlled phase III trial.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Trial
272 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieve a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation have an improved prognosis. The need for surgery in these patients has been questioned, but the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response is small. We aimed to assess whether adding cycles of mFOLFOX6 between chemoradiation and surgery increased the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response.
methodsWe did a phase 2, non-randomised trial consisting of four sequential study groups of patients with stage II-III locally advanced rectal cancer at 17 institutions in the USA and Canada. All patients received chemoradiation (fluorouracil 225 mg/m(2) per day by continuous infusion throughout radiotherapy, and 45·0 Gy in 25 fractions, 5 days per week for 5 weeks, followed by a minimum boost of 5·4 Gy). Patients in group 1 had total mesorectal excision 6-8 weeks after chemoradiation. Patients in groups 2-4 received two, four, or six cycles of mFOLFOX6, respectively, between chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision. Each cycle of mFOLFOX6 consisted of racemic leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) or 400 mg/m(2), according to the discretion of the treating investigator, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) in a 2-h infusion, bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, and a 46-h infusion of fluorouracil 2400 mg/m(2). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a pathological complete response, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00335816.
findingsBetween March 24, 2004, and Nov 16, 2012, 292 patients were registered, 259 of whom (60 in group 1, 67 in group 2, 67 in group 3, and 65 in group 4) met criteria for analysis. 11 (18%, 95% CI 10-30) of 60 patients in group 1, 17 (25%, 16-37) of 67 in group 2, 20 (30%, 19-42) of 67 in group 3, and 25 (38%, 27-51) of 65 in group 4 achieved a pathological complete response (p=0·0036). Study group was independently associated with pathological complete response (group 4 compared with group 1 odds ratio 3·49, 95% CI 1·39-8·75; p=0·011). In group 2, two (3%) of 67 patients had grade 3 adverse events associated with the neoadjuvant administration of mFOLFOX6 and one (1%) had a grade 4 adverse event; in group 3, 12 (18%) of 67 patients had grade 3 adverse events; in group 4, 18 (28%) of 65 patients had grade 3 adverse events and five (8%) had grade 4 adverse events. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events associated with the neoadjuvant administration of mFOLFOX6 across groups 2-4 were neutropenia (five in group 3 and six in group 4) and lymphopenia (three in group 3 and four in group 4). Across all study groups, 25 grade 3 or worse surgery-related complications occurred (ten in group 1, five in group 2, three in group 3, and seven in group 4); the most common were pelvic abscesses (seven patients) and anastomotic leaks (seven patients).
interpretationDelivery of mFOLFOX6 after chemoradiation and before total mesorectal excision has the potential to increase the proportion of patients eligible for less invasive treatment strategies; this strategy is being tested in phase 3 clinical trials.
fundingNational Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.