Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26187503›Full record

ReviewGut2015

Genetic architecture of colorectal cancer.

Ulrike Peters, Stephanie Bien, Niha Zubair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Exploring the Role ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. PITX1 plays essential functions in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023
    Review
  20. Review

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ulrike PetersPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Stephanie BienPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Niha ZubairPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Molecular pathological epidemiology of colorectal cancerU01CA137088 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PETERS, ULRIKE · 2009 to 2018
$21.8M
Detection of Colorectal Cancer Susceptibility Loci Using Genome-Wide SequencingU01CA164930 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PETERS, ULRIKE · 2012 to 2015
$12.4M
Genome-Wide Association Study of Nonsynonymous SNPs in Colon CancerR01CA059045 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PETERS, ULRIKE · 1994 to 2011
$11.5M
Prospective Study on Selenium, Genectics of Selenoenzymes, and Colorectal CancerR01CA120582 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PETERS, ULRIKE · 2006 to 2014
$2.1M
FHCRC High-Performance Computing ClusterS10OD020069 · OD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI KOOPERBERG, CHARLES L · 2015 to 2015
$600k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA059045NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120582NCI NIH HHS U01 CA137088NCI NIH HHS U01 CA164930NIH HHS S10 OD020069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex disease that develops as a consequence of both genetic and environmental risk factors. A small proportion (3-5%) of cases arise from hereditary syndromes predisposing to early onset CRC as a result of mutations in over a dozen well defined genes. In contrast, CRC is predominantly a late onset 'sporadic' disease, developing in individuals with no obvious hereditary syndrome. In recent years, genome wide association studies have discovered that over 40 genetic regions are associated with weak effects on sporadic CRC, and it has been estimated that increasingly large genome wide scans will identify many additional novel genetic regions. Subsequent experimental validations have identified the causally related variant(s) in a limited number of these genetic regions. Further biological insight could be obtained through ethnically diverse study populations, larger genetic sequencing studies and development of higher throughput functional experiments. Along with inherited variation, integration of the tumour genome may shed light on the carcinogenic processes in CRC. In addition to summarising the genetic architecture of CRC, this review discusses genetic factors that modify environmental predictors of CRC, as well as examples of how genetic insight has improved clinical surveillance, prevention and treatment strategies. In summary, substantial progress has been made in uncovering the genetic architecture of CRC, and continued research efforts are expected to identify additional genetic risk factors that further our biological understanding of this disease. Subsequently these new insights will lead to improved treatment and prevention of colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyMutationColorectal NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmHumansRisk FactorsDNA, NeoplasmCOLORECTAL CANCER

Identifiers

PMID26187503
PMCPMC4567512
OpenAlexW2261110864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.