Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26187453›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2015

Ventromedial prefrontal cortex drives hippocampal theta oscillations induced by mismatch computations.

Marta I Garrido, Gareth R Barnes, Dharshan Kumaran, Eleanor A Maguire, Raymond J Dolan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dissecting the Function of Hippocampal Oscillations in a Human Anxiety Model.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Generalization of cognitive maps across space and time.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Experiencing Surprise: The Temporal Dynamics of Its Impact on Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marta I GarridoQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Brisbane, Australia; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: m.garrido@uq.edu.au.
Gareth R BarnesWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Dharshan KumaranInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Eleanor A MaguireWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Raymond J DolanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1002276Medical Research Council MR/K005464/1Wellcome Trust 085316/Z/08/ZWellcome Trust 091593Wellcome Trust 098362Wellcome Trust 101759Wellcome Trust 101759/Z/13/ZWellcome Trust WT085189MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting environmental change is fundamental for adaptive behavior in an uncertain world. Previous work indicates the hippocampus supports the generation of novelty signals via implementation of a match-mismatch detector that signals when an incoming sensory input violates expectations based on past experience. While existing work has emphasized the particular contribution of the hippocampus, here we ask which other brain structures also contribute to match-mismatch detection. Furthermore, we leverage the fine-grained temporal resolution of magnetoencephalography (MEG) to investigate whether mismatch computations are spectrally confined to the theta range, based on the prominence of this range of oscillations in models of hippocampal function. By recording MEG activity while human subjects perform a task that incorporates conditions of match-mismatch novelty we show that mismatch signals are confined to the theta band and are expressed in both the hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Effective connectivity analyses (dynamic causal modeling) show that the hippocampus and vmPFC work as a functional circuit during mismatch detection. Surprisingly, our results suggest that the vmPFC drives the hippocampus during the generation and processing of mismatch signals. Our findings provide new evidence that the hippocampal-vmPFC circuit is engaged during novelty processing, which has implications for emerging theories regarding the role of vmPFC in memory.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHippocampusHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexPsychomotor PerformanceTheta RhythmYoung AdultConnectivityHippocampusMEGMismatchNoveltyPredictionTheta entrainmentUncertaintyVentromedial prefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID26187453
PMCPMC4594308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.