Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26187404›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2015

Mobile App-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: Feasibility and Initial Efficacy Among Veterans With Cannabis Use Disorders.

Kimberly A Babson, Danielle E Ramo, Lisa Baldini, Ryan Vandrey, Marcel O Bonn-Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly A BabsonNational Center for PTSD, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, United States. kimberly.babson@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9233-8230
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Role of Sleep in the Treatment of Cannabis DependenceU01DA031784 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VANDREY, RYAN G · 2012 to 2016
$3.2M
Social Media Intervention for Young Adult SmokersK23DA032578 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RAMO, DANIELLE E · 2012 to 2016
$927k
The Impact of CBT-I on Cannabis Cessation OutcomesIK2CX001023 · VA · VETERANS ADMIN PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYS · PI BABSON, KIMBERLY ANNE · 2014 to 2016
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX001023NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA032578NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA031784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCannabis is the most frequently used illicit substance in the United States resulting in high rates of cannabis use disorders. Current treatments for cannabis use are often met with high rates of lapse/relapse, tied to (1) behavioral health factors that impact cannabis use such as poor sleep, and (2) access, stigma, supply, and cost of receiving a substance use intervention.

objectiveThis pilot study examined the feasibility, usability, and changes in cannabis use and sleep difficulties following mobile phone-delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) in the context of a cannabis cessation attempt.

methodsFour male veterans with DSM-5 cannabis use disorder and sleep problems were randomized to receive a 2-week intervention: CBT-I Coach mobile app (n=2) or a placebo control (mood-tracking app) (n=2). Cannabis and sleep measures were assessed pre- and post-treatment. Participants also reported use and helpfulness of each app. Changes in sleep and cannabis use were evaluated for each participant individually.

resultsBoth participants receiving CBT-I used the app daily over 2 weeks and found the app user-friendly, helpful, and would use it in the future. In addition, they reported decreased cannabis use and improved sleep efficiency; one also reported increased sleep quality. In contrast, one participant in the control group dropped out of the study, and the other used the app minimally and reported increased sleep quality but also increased cannabis use. The mood app was rated as not helpful, and there was low likelihood of future participation.

conclusionsThis pilot study examined the feasibility and initial patient acceptance of mobile phone delivery of CBT-I for cannabis dependence. Positive ratings of the app and preliminary reports of reductions in cannabis use and improvements in sleep are both encouraging and support additional evaluation of this intervention.

Indexed as

cannabisCBT-Iinterventionmarijuanasleep

Identifiers

PMID26187404
PMCPMC4527004
OpenAlexW1593419702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.