Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26186949›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of men's health2017

U.S. Men's Perceptions and Experiences of Emergency Contraceptives.

Rachel L Wright, Peter R Fawson, Caren J Frost, David K Turok

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of men's health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel L Wright1 Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA.
Peter R Fawson1 Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA.
Caren J Frost2 University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
David K Turok2 University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Appalachian State University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

EC Method: Determinants for Copper IUD Use and Future Unintended PregnancyR21HD063028 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI TUROK, DAVID · 2010 to 2011
$406k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD063028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research suggests that men should be included in reproductive health decision making to help enhance positive health outcomes for their partners. Men affect the use of contraception and what method is used. Men's decisions may be affected by different factors such as gender, education, and the nature of their sexual relationship. A qualitative study was conducted to explore males' experiences and perceptions about emergency contraception (EC), and the meanings males assign to EC. Semistructured in-depth focus groups were held with 15 men who engage in heterosexual activity recruited from a university setting in the United States. Participants expressed egalitarian views of the contraception decision-making processes, a sense of responsibility regarding reproductive decision making, and that society has a negative stigma toward those who use EC. However, there was a lack of knowledge regarding the copper intrauterine device, which was not viewed as a method of EC. Exploring the role and needs of men in reproductive health care discussions and research is an important and growing area. Recommendations are provided for health care practitioners, policy, and future research around men and EC.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorContraceptives, PostcoitalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultHumansMaleQualitative ResearchUnited StatesYoung AdultContraceptives, Postcoitalgender rolehealth awarenessqualitative researchsexual socialization

Identifiers

PMID26186949
PMCPMC5675232
OpenAlexW903732479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.