ArticlePloS one2015
Characterizing Participants in the ClinSeq Genome Sequencing Cohort as Early Adopters of a New Health Technology.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06441981 (Closing the Gap in Public Perception and Policy for SARS-CoV-2 Whole Genome Sequencing and Genomics for All), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Closing the Gap in Public Perception and Policy for SARS-CoV-2 Whole Genome Sequencing and Genomics for All
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptation of the working alliance inventory for the assessment of the therapeutic alliance in genetic counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Trial
- Perceptions of uncertainties about carrier results identified by exome sequencing in a randomized controlled trial.Translational behavioral medicine · 2020Trial
- A randomized controlled study of a consent intervention for participating in an NIH genome sequencing study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Trial
- Web Platform vs In-Person Genetic Counselor for Return of Carrier Results From Exome Sequencing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2018Trial
- Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contexts.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contexts.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The ACMG SF v3.0 gene list increases returnable variant detection by 22% when compared with v2.0 in the ClinSeq cohort.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022Article
- The role of future-oriented affect in engagement with genomic testing results.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- Characteristics and experiences of patients from a community-based and consumer-directed hereditary cancer population screening initiative.HGG advances · 2022Article
- Dyadic concordance and associations of beliefs with intentions to learn carrier results from genomic sequencing.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Community oncologists' perceptions and utilization of large-panel genomic tumor testing.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Ethical, legal and social implications of human genome studies in radiation research: a workshop report for studies on atomic bomb survivors at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation.Journal of radiation research · 2021Article
- A survey of aortic disease biorepository participants' preferences for return of research genetic results.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Article
- Knowing, relationships and trust-citizens' perceptions of whole genome sequencing for the Genetics Clinic of the Future.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- Perceptions of virtual primary care physicians: A focus group study of medical and data science graduate students.PloS one · 2020Article
- Mind the gap: resources required to receive, process and interpret research-returned whole genome data.Human genetics · 2019Review
- Development of patient "profiles" to tailor counseling for incidental genomic sequencing results.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2019Article
- Knowledge, motivations, expectations, and traits of an African, African-American, and Afro-Caribbean sequencing cohort and comparisons to the original ClinSeqGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Article
- Using the diffusion of innovations model to guide participant engagement in the genomics era.Journal of genetic counseling · 2019Article
- Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium.Genome medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome sequencing is a novel clinical tool that has the potential to identify genetic origins of disease. However, the complexities of this new technology are significant and little is known about its integration into clinical care, and its potential adoption by patients. Expectations of its promise for personalized medicine are high and it is important to properly match expectations to the realities of the test. The NIH ClinSeq cohort study pilots the integration of genome sequencing into clinical research and care to assess the technical, medical and socio-behavioral aspects of implementing this technology. Over 950 adults ages 45-65 have been enrolled and clinically phenotyped. As an initial study, we describe the personality traits of ClinSeq participants, and explore how these traits compare to those that characterize early adopters of other new technologies. Our analysis was conducted on responses from 630 members of the cohort who completed a baseline survey on health cognitions, affect, health-related behaviors and personality traits, prior to receipt of any genome sequencing results. The majority of participants were white (90.5%), had at least a college degree (86.5%), and had at least one biological child (74.6%). Members of this ClinSeq sample were found to be high in dispositional optimism and resilience. Their high SES paralleled that of other early adopters of new technology. These attributes may contribute to participants' expectations for favorable outcomes and willingness to take higher risks when compared to the general population. These characteristics may distinguish those who are most likely to pursue genome sequencing and be indicative of their psychological resources to manage returned results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.