Trial reportCritical care medicine2015
The System-Wide Effect of Real-Time Audiovisual Feedback and Postevent Debriefing for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality Improvement Initiative.
Trial report in Critical care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Job Satisfaction of Nurses in the Context of Clinical Supervision: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Does clinical supervision of healthcare professionals improve effectiveness of care and patient experience? A systematic review.BMC health services research · 2017Pooled it
- Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a non-shockable rhythm: a randomised controlled feasibility trial (COMPRESS-RCT).Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018Trial
- Trial
- The Role of Different Feedback Devices in the Survival of Patients in Cardiac Arrest: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Real-time feedback for CPR quality - A scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Do cardiopulmonary resuscitation real-time audiovisual feedback devices improve patient outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- The effect of audiovisual feedback of monitor/defibrillators on percentage of appropriate compression depth and rate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Article
- In situ simulation-based team training and its significance for transfer of learning to clinical practice-A qualitative focus group interview study of anaesthesia personnel.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- A comparison of the effectiveness of QCPR and conventional CPR training in final-year medical students at a South African university.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2022Article
- [Basic life support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021Review
- Adult Basic Life Support: International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.Resuscitation · 2020Article
- The impact of a fellow-driven debriefing program after pediatric cardiac arrests.BMC medical education · 2019Article
- Real-time compression feedback for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest: a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial.Journal of intensive care · 2019Article
- The implementation of cardiac arrest treatment recommendations in English acute NHS trusts: a national survey.Postgraduate medical journal · 2017Article
- [Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation.]Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2017Review
- [Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation.]Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2015Article
- Increasing Internal Medicine Resident Confidence in Leading Inpatient Cardiopulmonary Resuscitations and Improving Patient Outcomes.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- A comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard manual compressions versus compressions with real-time audiovisual feedback: A randomized controlled pilot study.International journal of critical illness and injury scienceArticle
- Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis.International journal of critical illness and injury scienceReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of implementing real-time audiovisual feedback with and without postevent debriefing on survival and quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality at in-hospital cardiac arrest.
designA two-phase, multicentre prospective cohort study.
settingThree UK hospitals, all part of one National Health Service Acute Trust. PATIENTS: One thousand three hundred and ninety-five adult patients who sustained an in-hospital cardiac arrest at the study hospitals and were treated by hospital emergency teams between November 2009 and May 2013.
interventionsDuring phase 1, quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and patient outcomes were measured with no intervention implemented. During phase 2, staff at hospital 1 received real-time audiovisual feedback, whereas staff at hospital 2 received real-time audiovisual feedback supplemented by postevent debriefing. No intervention was implemented at hospital 3 during phase 2. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsThe primary outcome was return of spontaneous circulation. Secondary endpoints included other patient-focused outcomes, such as survival to hospital discharge, and process-focused outcomes, such as chest compression depth. Random-effect logistic and linear regression models, adjusted for baseline patient characteristics, were used to analyze the effect of the interventions on study outcomes. In comparison with no intervention, neither real-time audiovisual feedback (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.31-1.22; p=0.17) nor real-time audiovisual feedback supplemented by postevent debriefing (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.35-1.21; p=0.17) was associated with a statistically significant improvement in return of spontaneous circulation or any process-focused outcome. Despite this, there was evidence of a system-wide improvement in phase 2, leading to improvements in return of spontaneous circulation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.06-3.30; p=0.03) and process-focused outcomes.
conclusionsImplementation of real-time audiovisual feedback with or without postevent debriefing did not lead to a measured improvement in patient or process-focused outcomes at individual hospital sites. However, there was an unexplained system-wide improvement in return of spontaneous circulation and process-focused outcomes during the second phase of the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.