Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26186462›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Towards the Personalized Treatment of Glioblastoma: Integrating Patient-Specific Clinical Data in a Continuous Mechanical Model.

Maria Cristina Colombo, Chiara Giverso, Elena Faggiano, Carlo Boffano, Francesco Acerbi, Pasquale Ciarletta

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Go-or-grow models in biology: a monster on a leash.Journal of mathematical biology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Modelling microtube driven invasion of glioma.Journal of mathematical biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Biomechanical modelling of spinal tumour anisotropic growth.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Cristina ColomboMOX-Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy; Fondazione CEN, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Chiara GiversoMOX-Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy; Fondazione CEN, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Elena FaggianoMOX-Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy; Labs-Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Carlo BoffanoNeuroradiology-Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Francesco AcerbiDepartment of Neurosurgery-Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Pasquale CiarlettaSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 7190, Institut Jean Le Rond d'Alembert, F-75005 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive and malignant among brain tumors. In addition to uncontrolled proliferation and genetic instability, GBM is characterized by a diffuse infiltration, developing long protrusions that penetrate deeply along the fibers of the white matter. These features, combined with the underestimation of the invading GBM area by available imaging techniques, make a definitive treatment of GBM particularly difficult. A multidisciplinary approach combining mathematical, clinical and radiological data has the potential to foster our understanding of GBM evolution in every single patient throughout his/her oncological history, in order to target therapeutic weapons in a patient-specific manner. In this work, we propose a continuous mechanical model and we perform numerical simulations of GBM invasion combining the main mechano-biological characteristics of GBM with the micro-structural information extracted from radiological images, i.e. by elaborating patient-specific Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) data. The numerical simulations highlight the influence of the different biological parameters on tumor progression and they demonstrate the fundamental importance of including anisotropic and heterogeneous patient-specific DTI data in order to obtain a more accurate prediction of GBM evolution. The results of the proposed mathematical model have the potential to provide a relevant benefit for clinicians involved in the treatment of this particularly aggressive disease and, more importantly, they might drive progress towards improving tumor control and patient's prognosis.

Indexed as

Patient-Specific ModelingPrecision MedicineAnisotropyGlioblastomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNumerical Analysis, Computer-AssistedTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID26186462
PMCPMC4505854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.