Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26186307›Full record

ArticleTelemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association2016

Body-Worn Sensors in Parkinson's Disease: Evaluating Their Acceptability to Patients.

James M Fisher, Nils Y Hammerla, Lynn Rochester, Peter Andras, Richard W Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ethical, Legal, Organisational and Social Issues of Teleneurology: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James M Fisher1 Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital , North Shields, United Kingdom .
Nils Y Hammerla2 Culture Lab, School of Computing Science, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom .
Lynn Rochester3 Clinical Ageing Research Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom .
Peter Andras4 School of Computing and Mathematics, Keele University , Keele, United Kingdom .
Richard W Walker1 Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital , North Shields, United Kingdom .

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_14101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote monitoring of symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) using body-worn sensors would assist treatment decisions and evaluation of new treatments. To date, a rigorous, systematic evaluation of the acceptability of body-worn sensors in PD has not been undertaken. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-four participants wore bilateral wrist-worn sensors for 4 h in a research facility and then for 1 week at home. Participants' experiences of wearing the sensors were evaluated using a Likert-style questionnaire after each phase. Qualitative data were collected through free-text responses. Differences in responses between phases were assessed by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Content analysis of qualitative data was undertaken. "Non-wear time" was estimated via analysis of accelerometer data for periods when sensors were stationary.

resultsAfter prolonged wearing there was a negative shift in participants' views on the comfort of the sensor; problems with the sensor's strap were highlighted. However, accelerometer data demonstrated high patient concordance with wearing of the sensors. There was no evidence that participants were less likely to wear the sensors in public. Most participants preferred wearing the sensors to completing symptom diaries.

conclusionsThe finding that participants were not less likely to wear the sensors in public provides reassurance regarding the ecological validity of the data captured. The validity of our findings was strengthened by "triangulation" of data sources, enabling patients to express their agenda and repeated assessment after prolonged wearing. Long-term monitoring with wrist-worn sensors is acceptable to this cohort of PD patients. Evaluation of the wearer's experience is critical to the development of remote monitoring technology.

Indexed as

AccelerometryPatient SatisfactionAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedMotor ActivityParkinson DiseaseRemote ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicinebody-worn sensorshome monitoringParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID26186307
PMCPMC4739122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.