Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26185985›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Bioactivity Studies of β-Lactam Derived Polycyclic Fused Pyrroli-Dine/Pyrrolizidine Derivatives in Dentistry: In Vitro, In Vivo and In Silico Studies.

Gowri Meiyazhagan, Rajesh Raju, Sofi Beaula Winfred, Bhavani Mannivanan, Hemadev Bhoopalan, Venkatesh Shankar, Sathiya Sekar, Deepa Parvathi Venkatachalam, Ravishankar Pitani, Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Investigation of Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties ofJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gowri MeiyazhaganDepartment of Human Genetics, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Rajesh RajuDepartment of Organic Chemistry, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Sofi Beaula WinfredDepartment of Human Genetics, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Bhavani MannivananDepartment of Human Genetics, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Hemadev BhoopalanDepartment of Human Genetics, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Venkatesh ShankarDepartment of Bioinformatics, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamilnadu, India.
Sathiya SekarCenter for Toxicology and Developmental Research, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Deepa Parvathi VenkatachalamDepartment of Human Genetics, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Ravishankar PitaniDepartment of Community Medicine, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai Tamilnadu, India.
Venkateshbabu NagendrababuDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Malini ThaimanCentral Research Facility, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Kandaswamy DevivanayagamDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Jeyakanthan JayaramanDepartment of Bioinformatics, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamilnadu, India.
Raghunathan RagavacharyDepartment of Organic Chemistry, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Ganesh VenkatramanDepartment of Human Genetics, Sri Ramachandra University, Porur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research · INAlagappa University · INUniversity of Madras · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antibacterial activity of β-lactam derived polycyclic fused pyrrolidine/pyrrolizidine derivatives synthesized by 1, 3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction was evaluated against microbes involved in dental infection. Fifteen compounds were screened; among them compound 3 showed efficient antibacterial activity in an ex vivo dentinal tubule model and in vivo mice infectious model. In silico docking studies showed greater affinity to penicillin binding protein. Cell damage was observed under Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) which was further proved by Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) and quantified using Flow Cytometry by PI up-take. Compound 3 treated E. faecalis showed ROS generation and loss of membrane integrity was quantified by flow cytometry. Compound 3 was also found to be active against resistant E. faecalis strains isolated from failed root canal treatment cases. Further, compound 3 was found to be hemocompatible, not cytotoxic to normal mammalian NIH 3T3 cells and non mutagenic. It was concluded that β-lactam compound 3 exhibited promising antibacterial activity against E. faecalis involved in root canal infections and the mechanism of action was deciphered. The results of this research can be further implicated in the development of potent antibacterial medicaments with applications in dentistry.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsBicuspidBiofilmsComputer SimulationDrosophila melanogasterDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEnterococcus faecalisFemaleHumansMice, Inbred BALB CMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, MolecularPenicillin-Binding ProteinsProtein BindingAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsPenicillin-Binding ProteinsPyrrolidinesReactive Oxygen SpeciesRoot Canal Irrigants

Identifiers

PMID26185985
PMCPMC4505899
OpenAlexW860158013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.