Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26185754›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

Regenerating Salivary Glands in the Microenvironment of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Hitomi Ono, Aya Obana, Yu Usami, Manabu Sakai, Kanji Nohara, Hiroshi Egusa, Takayoshi Sakai

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Salivary Gland Bioengineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Dental Pulp Stem Cells for Salivary Gland Regeneration-Where Are We Today?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bioengineering in salivary gland regeneration.Journal of biomedical science · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. [Research progress in cell therapy and tissue engineering approach to regenerate salivary gland].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hitomi OnoDepartment of Oral-Facial Disorders, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Aya ObanaDepartment of Oral-Facial Disorders, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Yu UsamiDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Manabu SakaiClinical Laboratory, Osaka University Dental Hospital, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Kanji NoharaDepartment of Oral-Facial Disorders, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Hiroshi EgusaDivision of Molecular and Regenerative Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan.
Takayoshi SakaiDepartment of Oral-Facial Disorders, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Osaka University · JPChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USOsaka University Hospital · JPTohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report describes our initial attempt to regenerate salivary glands using induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells in vivo and in vitro. Glandular tissues that were similar to the adult submandibular glands (SMGs) and sublingual glands could be partially produced by the transplantation of iPS cells into mouse salivary glands. However, the tumorigenicity of iPS cells has not been resolved yet. It is well known that stem cells affect their microenvironment, known as a stem cell niche. We focused on the niche and the interaction between iPS cells and salivary gland cells in our study on salivary gland regeneration. Coculture of embryonic SMG cells and iPS cells have better-developed epithelial structures and fewer undifferentiated specific markers than monoculture of embryonic SMG cells in vitro. These results suggest that iPS cells have a potential ability to accelerate differentiation for salivary gland development and regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMiceRegenerationSalivary GlandsStem Cell NicheTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID26185754
PMCPMC4491559
OpenAlexW1746815941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.