Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26185417›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2015

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of three dosing regimens of agalsidase alfa enzyme replacement therapy in adults with Fabry disease.

Lubor Goláň, Ozlem Goker-Alpan, Myrl Holida, Ikka Kantola, Mariusz Klopotowski, Johanna Kuusisto, Aleš Linhart, Jacek Musial, Kathleen Nicholls, Derlis Gonzalez-Rodriguez and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01124643 (An Open-label Extension of Study TKT028 Evaluating Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Replagal® Enzyme Replacement Therapy Administered to Adult Patients With Fabry Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01124643 phase3completednot on this map

An Open-label Extension of Study TKT028 Evaluating Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Replagal® Enzyme Replacement Therapy Administered to Adult Patients With Fabry Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorShireRan2010 to 2013Enrolled35ConditionsFabry DiseaseArmsReplagal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Anderson-Fabry Disease: From Endothelial Dysfunction to Emerging Therapies.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Fabry Disease Therapy: State-of-the-Art and Current Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Lubor GoláňFirst Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ozlem Goker-AlpanLysosomal Research and Treatment Unit, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Myrl HolidaStead Family Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Ikka KantolaDivision of Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Mariusz KlopotowskiInstitute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Johanna KuusistoDepartment of Medicine, Center for Medicine and Clinical Research, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Aleš LinhartFirst Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jacek MusialDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Kathleen NichollsDepartment of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital and the University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Derlis Gonzalez-RodriguezInstituto Privado de Hematologia E Investigacion Clinica (IPHIC), Asuncion, Paraguay.
Reena SharmaSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Bojan VujkovacGeneral Hospital Slovenj Gradec, Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia.
Peter ChangShire, Lexington, MA, USA.
Anna WijatykShire, Lexington, MA, USA.
Charles University · CZTakeda (United States) · USInstitute of Cardiology · PLInstituto Privado de Hematología e Investigación Clínica · PYJagiellonian University · PLKuopio University Hospital · FILysosomal and Rare Disorders Research and Treatment Center · USSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBŠolski center Slovenj Gradec · SIThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUTurku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEfficacy and safety of agalsidase alfa at 0.2 mg/kg weekly were compared with 0.2 mg/kg every other week (EOW). Exploratory analyses were performed for 0.4 mg/kg weekly. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis was a 53-week, Phase III/IV, multicenter, open-label study (NCT01124643) in treatment-naïve adults (≥18 years) with Fabry disease. Inclusion criteria were left ventricular hypertrophy at baseline, defined as left ventricular mass indexed to height >50 g/m(2.7) for males and >47 g/m(2.7) for females. Primary endpoint was reduction of left ventricular mass indexed to height as assessed by echocardiography. Secondary endpoints included cardiac (peak oxygen consumption, 6-minute walk test, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, New York Heart Association classification), renal (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate), and biomarker (plasma globotriaosylceramide) assessments. Safety endpoints were adverse events and anti-agalsidase alfa antibodies.

resultsTwenty patients were randomized to 0.2 mg/kg EOW (mean age, 50.3 years; 70% male), 19 to 0.2 mg/kg weekly (51.8 years; 53% male), and 5 to 0.4 mg/kg weekly (49.4 years; 40% male). The mean change in left ventricular mass indexed to height by Week 53 in the 0.2-mg/kg EOW and weekly groups was 3.2 g/m(2.7) and 0.5 g/m(2.7), with no significant difference between groups. No clinically meaningful changes by Week 53 were found within or between the 0.2-mg/kg groups for peak oxygen consumption, 6-minute walk test, or Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Two patients in each group improved by ≥1 New York Heart Association classification. No significant differences were found between 0.2 mg/kg EOW and weekly for mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (-1.21 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs -3.32 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) or plasma globotriaosylceramide (-1.05 nmol/mL vs -2.13 nmol/mL), respectively. Infusion-related adverse events were experienced by 25% and 21% in the 0.2-mg/kg EOW and weekly groups. Tachycardia, fatigue, and hypotension were experienced by two or more patients overall. Anti-agalsidase alfa antibodies were detected in 11.4% of patients and neutralizing antibodies in 6.8%. Infusion-related reactions did not appear to be correlated with antibody status.

conclusionNo efficacy or safety differences were found when the approved EOW dosage of agalsidase alfa was increased to weekly administration. Exploratory analyses for 0.4 mg/kg weekly showed similar results.

Indexed as

AdultAgedalpha-GalactosidaseDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnzyme Replacement TherapyFabry DiseaseFemaleHumansIsoenzymesMaleMiddle AgedRecombinant ProteinsTreatment Outcomeagalsidase alfaalpha-GalactosidaseIsoenzymesRecombinant Proteinsadverse eventsexercise toleranceleft ventricular hypertrophylysosomal storage disorderquality of liferenal function

Identifiers

PMID26185417
PMCPMC4501226
OpenAlexW1805405386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.