Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2015
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of three dosing regimens of agalsidase alfa enzyme replacement therapy in adults with Fabry disease.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01124643 (An Open-label Extension of Study TKT028 Evaluating Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Replagal® Enzyme Replacement Therapy Administered to Adult Patients With Fabry Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open-label Extension of Study TKT028 Evaluating Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Replagal® Enzyme Replacement Therapy Administered to Adult Patients With Fabry Disease
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Newborn screening for Fabry disease in the north-west of Spain.European journal of pediatrics · 2017Trial
- Long-Term Enzyme Replacement Therapy and Renal Outcomes in Fabry Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- A composite measurement concept for monitoring cardiac function in Fabry disease.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Clinical Efficacy and Real-World Effectiveness of Fabry Disease Treatments: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Therapeutic landscape of Fabry disease: advances and challenges from classical strategies to emerging therapies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Different diseases, different needs: Patient preferences for gene therapy in lysosomal storage disorders, a probabilistic threshold technique survey.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Long-term safety of enzyme replacement therapy with agalsidase alfa in patients with Fabry disease: post-marketing extension surveillance in Japan.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2024Article
- Fabry Disease in Women: Genetic Basis, Available Biomarkers, and Clinical Manifestations.Genes · 2023Review
- Late-onset and classic phenotypes of Fabry disease in males with theOpen heart · 2023Article
- The Safety of Agalsidase Alfa Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Canadian Patients with Fabry Disease Following Implementation of a Bioreactor Process.Drugs in R&D · 2021Article
- Prevalence of Fabry disease in men with tinnitus and sensorineural hearing loss.Journal of applied biomedicine · 2021Article
- Anderson-Fabry Disease: From Endothelial Dysfunction to Emerging Therapies.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2021Review
- Fabry Disease Therapy: State-of-the-Art and Current Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- The effect of enzyme replacement therapy on clinical outcomes in male patients with Fabry disease: A systematic literature review by a European panel of experts.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2019Review
- Fabry disease in the Spanish population: observational study with detection of 77 patients.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2018Observational
- Clinical Applications of Regulatory T cells in Adoptive Cell Therapies.Cell & gene therapy insights · 2018Article
- Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of three dosing regimens of agalsidase alfa enzyme replacement therapy was underpowered.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byAuthors’ reply.2015
Authors and funding
14 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEfficacy and safety of agalsidase alfa at 0.2 mg/kg weekly were compared with 0.2 mg/kg every other week (EOW). Exploratory analyses were performed for 0.4 mg/kg weekly. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis was a 53-week, Phase III/IV, multicenter, open-label study (NCT01124643) in treatment-naïve adults (≥18 years) with Fabry disease. Inclusion criteria were left ventricular hypertrophy at baseline, defined as left ventricular mass indexed to height >50 g/m(2.7) for males and >47 g/m(2.7) for females. Primary endpoint was reduction of left ventricular mass indexed to height as assessed by echocardiography. Secondary endpoints included cardiac (peak oxygen consumption, 6-minute walk test, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, New York Heart Association classification), renal (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate), and biomarker (plasma globotriaosylceramide) assessments. Safety endpoints were adverse events and anti-agalsidase alfa antibodies.
resultsTwenty patients were randomized to 0.2 mg/kg EOW (mean age, 50.3 years; 70% male), 19 to 0.2 mg/kg weekly (51.8 years; 53% male), and 5 to 0.4 mg/kg weekly (49.4 years; 40% male). The mean change in left ventricular mass indexed to height by Week 53 in the 0.2-mg/kg EOW and weekly groups was 3.2 g/m(2.7) and 0.5 g/m(2.7), with no significant difference between groups. No clinically meaningful changes by Week 53 were found within or between the 0.2-mg/kg groups for peak oxygen consumption, 6-minute walk test, or Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Two patients in each group improved by ≥1 New York Heart Association classification. No significant differences were found between 0.2 mg/kg EOW and weekly for mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (-1.21 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs -3.32 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) or plasma globotriaosylceramide (-1.05 nmol/mL vs -2.13 nmol/mL), respectively. Infusion-related adverse events were experienced by 25% and 21% in the 0.2-mg/kg EOW and weekly groups. Tachycardia, fatigue, and hypotension were experienced by two or more patients overall. Anti-agalsidase alfa antibodies were detected in 11.4% of patients and neutralizing antibodies in 6.8%. Infusion-related reactions did not appear to be correlated with antibody status.
conclusionNo efficacy or safety differences were found when the approved EOW dosage of agalsidase alfa was increased to weekly administration. Exploratory analyses for 0.4 mg/kg weekly showed similar results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.