Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26185194›Full record

ArticleInternational health2015

Measuring elimination of podoconiosis, endemicity classifications, case definition and targets: an international Delphi exercise.

Kebede Deribe, Samuel Wanji, Oumer Shafi, Edridah Muheki Tukahebwa, Irenee Umulisa, Gail Davey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Global epidemiology of podoconiosis: A systematic review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Risk Factors for Podoconiosis: Kamwenge District, Western Uganda, September 2015.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
  12. The global atlas of podoconiosis.The Lancet. Global health · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kebede DeribeBrighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, UK School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia kebededeka@yahoo.com.
Samuel WanjiResearch Foundation for Tropical Diseases and Environment, Buea, Cameroon Department of Microbiology and Parasitology , University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Oumer ShafiFederal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Edridah Muheki TukahebwaVector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Irenee UmulisaMalaria and OPD Division, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda.
Gail DaveyBrighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 091956Wellcome Trust 099876Wellcome Trust 100715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPodoconiosis is one of the major causes of lymphoedema in the tropics. Nonetheless, currently there are no endemicity classifications or elimination targets to monitor the effects of interventions. This study aimed at establishing case definitions and indicators that can be used to assess endemicity, elimination and clinical outcomes of podoconiosis.

methodsThis paper describes the result of a Delphi technique used among 28 experts. A questionnaire outlining possible case definitions, endemicity classifications, elimination targets and clinical outcomes was developed. The questionnaire was distributed to experts working on podoconiosis and other neglected tropical diseases in two rounds. The experts rated the importance of case definitions, endemic classifications, elimination targets and the clinical outcome measures. Median and mode were used to describe the central tendency of expert responses. The coefficient of variation was used to describe the dispersals of expert responses.

resultsConsensus on definitions and indicators for assessing endemicity, elimination and clinical outcomes of podoconiosis directed at policy makers and health workers was achieved following the two rounds of Delphi approach among the experts.

conclusionsBased on the two Delphi rounds we discuss potential indicators and endemicity classification of this disabling disease, and the ongoing challenges to its elimination in countries with the highest prevalence. Consensus will help to increase effectiveness of podoconiosis elimination efforts and ensure comparability of outcome data.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueDisease EradicationElephantiasisHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrevalenceTropical MedicineDelphiElephantiasisEliminationEndemicityNon-filarial elephantiasisPodoconiosis

Identifiers

PMID26185194
PMCPMC4550552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.