Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26185176›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2015

Assessing the effect of Michigan's smoke-free law on air quality inside restaurants and casinos: a before-and-after observational study.

Farid Shamo, Teri Wilson, Janet Kiley, James Repace

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Second-Hand Tobacco Smoke Exposure: Results of Particulate Matter (PMInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of Partial and Comprehensive Smoke-Free Regulations on Indoor Air Quality in Bars.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Farid ShamoThe Michigan Department of Community Health, Division of Chronic Diseases, Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Teri WilsonThe Michigan Department of Community Health, Division of Chronic Diseases, Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Janet KileyThe Michigan Department of Community Health, Division of Chronic Diseases, Lansing, Michigan, USA.
James RepaceRepace Associates, Inc, Bowie, Maryland, USA.

Funding

MICHIGAN COLLABORATIVE PREVENTION PROJECTS (BRFSS, DIABETES, TOBACCO AND HEALTHY U58DP001973 · DP · MICHIGAN STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES · PI TODD, ORLANDO · 2009 to 2014
$20.3M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 3U58DP001973-01S2NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP001973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the effect of Michigan's smoke-free air (SFA) law on the air quality inside selected restaurants and casinos. The hypothesis of the study: if the SFA law is effectively implemented in restaurants and casinos, there will be a significant reduction in the particulate matter PM2.5 measured in the same establishments after the law is implemented.

settingPrelaw and postlaw design study.

participants78 restaurants in 14 Michigan cities from six major regions of the state, and three Detroit casinos.

methodsWe monitored the real-time PM2.5 in 78 restaurants and three Detroit casinos before the SFA law, and again monitored the same restaurants and casinos after implementation of the law, which was enacted on 1 May 2010. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Concentration measurements of secondhand smoke (SHS) fine particles (PM2.5) were compared in each restaurant in the prelaw period to measurements of PM2.5 in the same restaurants during the postlaw period. A second comparison was made for PM2.5 levels in three Detroit casinos prelaw and postlaw; these casinos were exempted from the SFA law.

resultsPrelaw data indicated that 85% of the restaurants had poor to hazardous air quality, with the average venue having 'unhealthy' air according to Michigan's Air Quality Index for PM2.5. Postlaw, air quality in 93% of the restaurants improved to 'good'. The differences were statistically significant (p<0.0001). By comparison, the three casinos measured had 'unhealthy' air both before and after the law.

conclusionsThe significant air quality improvement in the Michigan restaurants after implementation of the SFA law indicates that the law was very effective in reducing exposure to SHS. Since the Detroit casinos were exempted from the law, the air quality was unchanged, and remained unhealthy in both prelaw and postlaw periods.

Indexed as

Particulate MatterRestaurantsSmoke-Free PolicyAir PollutantsAir Pollution, IndoorHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMichiganOccupational ExposureSmokingTobacco Smoke PollutionAir PollutantsParticulate MatterTobacco Smoke PollutionPUBLIC HEALTHSmoking and tobacco

Identifiers

PMID26185176
PMCPMC4513515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.