Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26185077›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2015

Commensal and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Metabolism in the Gut.

Tyrrell Conway, Paul S Cohen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 174 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 298 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  5. A systems-level atlas of carbon-response transcriptional states inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Loss of O-antigen due toScience advances · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Silent Reservoirs: Antibiotic-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Infection strategies ofGut microbes reports · 2026
    Review
  19. Inhibition ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tyrrell ConwayDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078.
Paul S CohenDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI.
Oklahoma State University · USUniversity of Rhode Island · US

Funding

GROWTH AND COLONIZATION OF THE INTESTINE BY E COLIR01AI048945 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA NORMAN · PI CONWAY, TYRRELL · 2000 to 2008
$3.4M
Symbiosis of E. coli and the Intestinal Microbiota in a Mouse ModelR01GM095370 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI CONWAY, TYRRELL · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
Growth and Colonization of the Intestine by E. coliR56AI048945 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI CONWAY, TYRRELL · 2009 to 2009
$462k
NIAID NIH HHS AI48945NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI048945NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI048945NIGMS NIH HHS GM095370NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E. coli is a ubiquitous member of the intestinal microbiome. This organism resides in a biofilm comprised of a complex microbial community within the mucus layer where it must compete for the limiting nutrients that it needs to grow fast enough to stably colonize. In this article we discuss the nutritional basis of intestinal colonization. Beginning with basic ecological principles we describe what is known about the metabolism that makes E. coli such a remarkably successful member of the intestinal microbiota. To obtain the simple sugars and amino acids that it requires, E. coli depends on degradation of complex glycoproteins by strict anaerobes. Despite having essentially the same core genome and hence the same metabolism when grown in the laboratory, different E. coli strains display considerable catabolic diversity when colonized in mice. To explain why some E. coli mutants do not grow as well on mucus in vitro as their wild type parents yet are better colonizers, we postulate that each one resides in a distinct "Restaurant" where it is served different nutrients because it interacts physically and metabolically with different species of anaerobes. Since enteric pathogens that fail to compete successfully for nutrients cannot colonize, a basic understanding of the nutritional basis of intestinal colonization will inform efforts to develop prebiotics and probiotics to combat infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiofilmsEnergy MetabolismEscherichia coliGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansIntestinal MucosaMiceSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID26185077
PMCPMC4510460
OpenAlexW1601466212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.