Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26184694›Full record

ArticleAtherosclerosis2015

Atherosclerosis following renal injury is ameliorated by pioglitazone and losartan via macrophage phenotype.

Suguru Yamamoto, Jiayong Zhong, Patricia G Yancey, Yiqin Zuo, MacRae F Linton, Sergio Fazio, Haichun Yang, Ichiei Narita, Valentina Kon

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Atherosclerosis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Suguru YamamotoDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Division of Clinical Nephrology and Rheumatology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Niigata, Japan.
Jiayong ZhongDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Patricia G YanceyDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Yiqin ZuoDepartment of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
MacRae F LintonDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sergio FazioDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Preventive Cardiology at The Knight Cardiovascular Institute of Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Haichun YangDepartment of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ichiei NaritaDivision of Clinical Nephrology and Rheumatology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Niigata, Japan.
Valentina KonDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: valentina.kon@vanderbilt.edu.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USNiigata University · JPOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Non-coding RNA & Bioinformatics CoreP01HL116263 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAVIES, SEAN STEPHEN · 2014 to 2025
$24.7M
Vanderbilt Mouse Metabolic Physiology CenterU24DK059637 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WASSERMAN, DAVID H · 2001 to 2015
$14.9M
ROLE OF SCAVENGER RECEPTORS IN RENAL FIBROSISP50DK044757 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FOGO, AGNES B. · 1992 to 2011
$11.5M
Vanderbilt Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping CenterU2CDK059637 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WASSERMAN, DAVID H · 2016 to 2021
$6.3M
FUNCTIONAL HIERARCHY OF REMNANT LIPOPROTEIN RECEPTORSR01HL057986 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FAZIO, SERGIO · 1998 to 2016
$6.2M
MACROPHAGE EXPRESSION OF APOAI AND ATHEROSCLEROSISR01HL065709 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FAZIO, SERGIO · 2000 to 2008
$3.2M
Role of Macrophage-Specific AT1R in Atherosclerosis of Chronic Kidney DysfunctionR01HL087061 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI KON, VALENTINA · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL087061NHLBI NIH HHS HL57986NHLBI NIH HHS HL65709NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL116263NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL057986NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL065709NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL087061NIDDK NIH HHS DK44757NIDDK NIH HHS DK59637-01NIDDK NIH HHS P50 DK044757NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK059637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveChronic kidney disease (CKD) amplifies atherosclerosis, which involves renin-angiotensin system (RAS) regulation of macrophages. RAS influences peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ), a modulator of atherogenic functions of macrophages, however, little is known about its effects in CKD. We examined the impact of combined therapy with a PPARγ agonist and angiotensin receptor blocker on atherogenesis in a murine uninephrectomy model.

methodsApolipoprotein E knockout mice underwent uninephrectomy (UNx) and treatment with pioglitazone (UNx + Pio), losartan (UNx + Los), or both (UNx + Pio/Los) for 10 weeks. Extent and characteristics of atherosclerotic lesions and macrophage phenotypes were assessed; RAW264.7 and primary peritoneal mouse cells were used to examine pioglitazone and losartan effects on macrophage phenotype and inflammatory response.

resultsUNx significantly increased atherosclerosis. Pioglitazone and losartan each significantly reduced the atherosclerotic burden by 29.6% and 33.5%, respectively; although the benefit was dramatically augmented by combination treatment which lessened atherosclerosis by 55.7%. Assessment of plaques revealed significantly greater macrophage area in UNx + Pio/Los (80.7 ± 11.4% vs. 50.3 ± 4.2% in UNx + Pio and 57.2 ± 6.5% in UNx + Los) with more apoptotic cells. The expanded macrophage-rich lesions of UNx + Pio/Los had more alternatively activated, Ym-1 and arginine 1-positive M2 phenotypes (Ym-1: 33.6 ± 8.2%, p < 0.05 vs. 12.0 ± 1.1% in UNx; arginase 1: 27.8 ± 0.9%, p < 0.05 vs. 11.8 ± 1.3% in UNx). In vitro, pioglitazone alone and together with losartan was more effective than losartan alone in dampening lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine production, suppressing M1 phenotypic change while enhancing M2 phenotypic change.

conclusionCombination of pioglitazone and losartan is more effective in reducing renal injury-induced atherosclerosis than either treatment alone. This benefit reflects mitigation in macrophage cytokine production, enhanced apoptosis, and a shift toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype.

Indexed as

Angiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAnimalsAortic DiseasesApolipoproteins EApoptosisAtherosclerosisCell LineCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHyperlipidemiasInflammationLosartanAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsApolipoproteins ECytokinesLosartanPioglitazonePPAR gammaThiazolidinedionesAtherosclerosisChronic kidney diseaseLosartanMacrophage phenotypePioglitazonePPARγ

Identifiers

PMID26184694
PMCPMC4850906
OpenAlexW2130207105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.