Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26184520›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2015

Analysis of circulating DNA and protein biomarkers to predict the clinical activity of regorafenib and assess prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective, exploratory analysis of the CORRECT trial.

Josep Tabernero, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Salvatore Siena, Alberto Sobrero, Alfredo Falcone, Marc Ychou, Yves Humblet, Olivier Bouché, Laurent Mineur, Carlo Barone and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01103323 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of Regorafenib Plus BSC Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 174 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01103323 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of Regorafenib Plus BSC Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Who Have Progressed After Standard Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorBayerRan2010 to 2014Enrolled760ConditionsMetastatic Colorectal CancerArmsRegorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506), Placebo, Best Supportive Care (BSC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 324 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Concordance of blood- and tumor-based detection of RAS mutations to guide anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017
    Trial
  20. Trial

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 7 countries.

Josep TaberneroVall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: jtabernero@vhio.net.
Heinz-Josef LenzUniversity of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Salvatore SienaNiguarda Cancer Center, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy; Università di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Alberto SobreroIRCCS San Martino IST, Genoa, Italy.
Alfredo FalconeUniversity Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Marc YchouICM-Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.
Yves HumbletSt-Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Olivier BouchéCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Reims, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims, France.
Laurent MineurGastrointestinal and Liver Oncology Unit, Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France.
Carlo BaroneCatholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Antoine AdenisCentre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Takayuki YoshinoNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Richard M GoldbergOhio State University School of Medicine, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
Daniel J SargentMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Andrea WagnerBayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany.
Dirk LaurentBayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany.
Michael TeufelBayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, NJ, USA.
Michael JeffersBayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, NJ, USA.
Axel GrotheyMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Eric Van CutsemUniversity Hospital Gasthuisberg/Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bayer (Germany) · DEBayer (United States) · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCentre Oscar Lambret · FRInstitut Sainte Catherine · FRKU Leuven · BENational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · USUCLouvain · BEUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MYLES G COCKBURN · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumour mutational status is an important determinant of the response of metastatic colorectal cancer to targeted treatments. However, the genotype of the tissue obtained at the time of diagnosis might not accurately represent tumour genotype after multiple lines of treatment. This retrospective exploratory analysis investigated the clinical activity of regorafenib in biomarker subgroups of the CORRECT study population defined by tumour mutational status or plasma protein levels.

methodsWe used BEAMing technology to identify KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF mutations in DNA obtained from the plasma of 503 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who enrolled in the CORRECT trial. We quantified total human genomic DNA isolated from plasma samples for 503 patients using a modified version of human long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) quantitive real-time PCR. We also measured the concentration of 15 proteins of interest-angiopoietin 2, interleukin 6, interleukin 8, placental growth factor, soluble TIE-1, soluble VEGFR1, VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGF-A isoform 121, bone morphogenetic protein 7, macrophage colony-stimulating factor, stromal cell-derived factor-1, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2, and von Willebrand factor-in plasma samples from 611 patients. We did correlative analyses of overall survival and progression-free survival in patient subgroups based on mutational status, circulating DNA concentration, and protein concentrations. The CORRECT trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01103323.

findingsTumour-associated mutations were readily detected with BEAMing of plasma DNA, with KRAS mutations identified in 349 (69%) of 503 patients, PIK3CA mutations in 84 (17%) of 503 patients, and BRAF mutations in 17 (3%) of 502 patients. We did not do correlative analysis based on BRAF genotype because of the low mutational frequency detected for this gene. Some of the most prevalent individual hot-spot mutations we identified included: KRAS (KRAS G12D, 116 [28%] of 413 mutations; G12V, 72 [17%]; and G13D, 67 [16%]) and PIK3CA (PIK3CA E542K, 27 [30%] of 89 mutations; E545K, 37 [42%]; and H1047R, 12 [14%]). 41 (48%) of 86 patients who had received anti-EGFR therapy and whose archival tumour tissue DNA was KRAS wild-type in BEAMing analysis were identified as having KRAS mutations in BEAMing analysis of fresh plasma DNA. Correlative analyses suggest a clinical benefit favouring regorafenib across patient subgroups defined by KRAS and PIK3CA mutational status (progression-free survival with regorafenib vs placebo: hazard ratio [HR] 0·52, 95% CI 0·35-0·76 for KRAS wild-type; HR 0·51, 95% CI 0·40-0·65 for KRAS mutant [KRAS wild type vs mutant, pinteraction=0·74]; HR 0·50, 95% CI 0·40-0·63 for PIK3CA wild-type; HR 0·54, 95% CI 0·32-0·89 for PIK3CA mutant [PIK3CA wild-type vs mutant, pinteraction=0·85]) or circulating DNA concentration (progression-free survival with regorafenib vs placebo: HR 0·53, 95% CI 0·40-0·71, for low circulating DNA concentrations; HR 0·52, 95% CI 0·40-0·70, for high circulating DNA concentrations; low vs high circulating DNA, pinteraction=0·601). With the exception of von Willebrand factor, assessed with the median cutoff method, plasma protein concentrations were also not associated with regorafenib activity in terms of progression-free survival. In univariable analyses, the only plasma protein that was associated with overall survival was TIE-1, high concentrations of which were associated with longer overall survival compared with low TIE-1 concentrations. This association was not significant in multivariable analyses.

interpretationBEAMing of circulating DNA could be a viable approach for non-invasive analysis of tumour genotype in real time and for the identification of potentially clinically relevant mutations that are not detected in archival tissue. Additionally, the results show that regorafenib seems to be consistently associated with a clinical benefit in a range of patient subgroups based on mutational status and protein biomarker concentrations.

fundingBayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA, NeoplasmFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDNA, NeoplasmKRAS protein, humanPhenylurea CompoundsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Pyridinesras ProteinsReceptor, TIE-1regorafenib

Identifiers

PMID26184520
PMCPMC7513622
OpenAlexW1904761682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.