ReviewClinical neuroradiology2015
Perspectives of Ultra-High-Field MRI in Neuroradiology.
Review in Clinical neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of an air layer on the design of high-permittivity material helmets for 7 T magnetic resonance imaging.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of brain MRS in older healthy adults at 7T.NMR in biomedicine · 2019Article
- Clinical application of advanced MR methods in children: points to consider.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2018Review
- Visualizing the Human Subcortex Using Ultra-high Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Brain topography · 2018Review
- Review
- Clinical vascular imaging in the brain at 7T.NeuroImage · 2018Review
- Non-invasive metabolic imaging of brain tumours in the era of precision medicine.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most important methods for the diagnosis and therapy monitoring of various diseases. Today, magnets up to 3 T are standard. This review will give an overview of the clinical perspectives of ultra-high field MRI, meaning mainly 7 T.
methodsLiterature review with focus on clinical applications of 7 T imaging in neuroscience combined with examples of own studies and perspectives.
resultsThis high-resolution technique offers the potential to improve certain tissue contrasts and signal in functional (fMRI) and metabolic (MRS) imaging. This overview demonstrates already existing potentials and advantages of the ultra-high magnetic field for central nervous system (CNS) diseases.
conclusionsAlthough there are still some technical challenges for brain and spine imaging at 7 T, the method has clear benefit in selected structural, functional, and metabolic imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26184503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.