Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26184253›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

U.S. Recreational Water Quality Criteria: A Vision for the Future.

Roger S Fujioka, Helena M Solo-Gabriele, Muruleedhara N Byappanahalli, Marek Kirs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Strategies for Monitoring Microbial Life in Beach Sand for Protection of Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microbial Source Tracking as a Method of Determination of Beach Sand Contamination.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Bathing Water Quality Monitoring Practices in Europe and the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  10. Selective survival ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Increase in outbreaks of gastroenteritis linked to bathing water in Finland in summer 2014.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Health Effects of Waterborne Contaminants: A Focus on Emerging Concerns.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roger S FujiokaWater Resources Research Center, University of Hawaii, 2540 Dole Street, Holmes Hall Rm.283, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. roger@hawaii.edu.
Helena M Solo-GabrieleDepartment of Civil, Arch., and Environmental Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA. hmsolo@miami.edu.
Muruleedhara N ByappanahalliGeological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, Lake Michigan Ecological Research Station, 1100 N. Mineral Springs Road, Porter, IN 46304, USA. byappan@usgs.gov.
Marek KirsWater Resources Research Center, University of Hawaii, 2540 Dole Street, Holmes Hall Rm.283, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. kirs@hawaii.edu.

Funding

Toxic Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs)P50ES012736 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ROSENTEIL SCHOOL · PI FLEMING, LORA ELDERKIN · 2004 to 2010
$2.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS P50 ES012736NIEHS NIH HHS P50 ES12736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript evaluates the U.S. Recreational Water Quality Criteria (RWQC) of 2012, based upon discussions during a conference held 11-13 March 2013, in Honolulu, Hawaii. The RWQC of 2012 did not meet expectations among the research community because key recommended studies were not completed, new data to assess risks to bathers exposed to non-point sources of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) were not developed, and the 2012 RWQC did not show marked improvements in strategies for assessing health risks for bathers using all types of recreational waters. The development of the 2012 RWQC was limited in scope because the epidemiologic studies at beach sites were restricted to beaches with point sources of pollution and water samples were monitored for only enterococci. The vision for the future is development of effective RWQC guidelines based on epidemiologic and quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) studies for sewage specific markers, as well as human enteric pathogens so that health risks for bathers at all recreational waters can be determined. The 2012 RWQC introduced a program for states and tribes to develop site-specific water quality criteria, and in theory this approach can be used to address the limitations associated with the measurements of the traditional FIB.

Indexed as

RecreationWater QualityBacteriaBathing BeachesEnterococcusFecesHumansRisk AssessmentSewageUnited StatesSewagealternate indicatorsextra-enteric fecal indicator bacteriamicrobial source trackingnonpoint source pollutionrecreational water quality criteriarecreational water quality standardstraditional fecal indicator bacteria

Identifiers

PMID26184253
PMCPMC4515689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.