Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26184010›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2015

Dissociable effects of NR2A and NR2B NMDA receptor antagonism on cognitive flexibility but not pattern separation.

Gaurav Kumar, Joseph Olley, Thomas Steckler, John Talpos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gaurav KumarJanssen Research & Development, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium. gkumar_discovery@yahoo.com.
Joseph OlleyJanssen Research & Development, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium.
Thomas StecklerJanssen Research & Development, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium.
John TalposJanssen Research & Development, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium.
Janssen (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleN-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors play crucial roles in learning and memory, but the role of each NMDA receptor subtype in a specific cognitive process is unclear. Non-selective blockers of NMDA receptor are used to model the cognitive impairment in schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. Counter-intuitively selective NR2A and 2B NMDA receptor antagonists are thought to have pro-cognitive properties. These seemingly contrasting findings might in part be the result of different compounds and behavioral measures used across studies.

objectiveWe compared the effect of NVP-AAM077 (NR2A antagonist), CP 101-606 (NR2B antagonist), and MK-801 (non-selective antagonist) in a series of touch screen tasks that can be used to measure spatial cognition and cognitive flexibility.

methodsNVP-AAM077, CP 101-606, and MK-801 were administered prior to testing, in adult male Lister-hooded rats trained in tasks of location discrimination, paired associate learning (PAL), and trial unique non-match to location (TUNL).

resultsResults showed that MK-801 impaired performance on all the tasks. In contrast, CP 101-606 only impaired reversal learning in location discrimination and had minimal effect on working memory in TUNL and caused a modest improvement in accuracy in PAL and acquisition of a spatial discrimination. NVP-AAM077 had little effect on performance across tasks, although these data allude to a potential enhancement of acquisition of a spatial location and impairments in spatial reversal learning in a separation-dependent manner.

conclusionsThese data demonstrated that non-selective NMDA antagonism will disrupt numerous aspects of cognitive function. However, selective antagonism is capable of impairing or enhancing cognitive function in a task-dependent fashion.

Indexed as

AnimalsAssociation LearningCognitionDizocilpine MaleateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsMalePiperidinesQuinoxalinesRatsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSpatial Memory5-(alpha-methyl-4-bromobenzylamino)phosphonomethyl-1,4-dihydroquinoxaline-2,3-dioneDizocilpine MaleateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsNR2A NMDA receptorNR2B NMDA receptorPiperidinesQuinoxalinesReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartatetraxoprodil mesylateCP 101-606Location discriminationMK-801NR2A antagonistNR2B antagonistNVP-AAM077Paired associate learningSpatial discriminationTouch screenTUNL

Identifiers

PMID26184010
OpenAlexW862434431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.