Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26183957›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016

Use of transanastomotic double-pigtail stents in the management of grade B colorectal leakage: a pilot feasibility study.

Christelle Blot, Charles Sabbagh, Lionel Rebibo, Franck Brazier, Cyril Chivot, Mathurin Fumery, Jean-Marc Regimbeau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christelle BlotDepartment of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Avenue René Laennec, 80054, Amiens Cedex 01, France.
Charles SabbaghDepartment of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Avenue René Laennec, 80054, Amiens Cedex 01, France.
Lionel RebiboDepartment of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Avenue René Laennec, 80054, Amiens Cedex 01, France.
Franck BrazierDepartment of Hepatogastroenterology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens Cedex 01, France.
Cyril ChivotDepartment of Radiology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens Cedex 01, France.
Mathurin FumeryJules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens Cedex 01, France.
Jean-Marc RegimbeauDepartment of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Avenue René Laennec, 80054, Amiens Cedex 01, France. regimbeau.jean-marc@chu-amiens.fr.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication of colorectal surgery. The leakage is classified as grade B when the patient's clinical condition requires an active therapeutic intervention but does not require further surgery. The management of grade B AL commonly includes administration of antibiotics and/or the placement of a pelvic drainage performed under radiological guidance or transanal drain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and the efficacy of endoscopic transanastomotic drainage using double-pigtail stents (DPSs) in the management of grade B AL in colorectal surgery. PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween September 2011 and December 2014, 650 patients underwent a colorectal procedure in our university hospital; 8.7 % presented with AL, including 42.8 % with grade B. Fourteen patients required endoscopic management and constituted the study population. The study's primary objective was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of DPS placement for the treatment of grade B AL after colorectal surgery. The secondary endpoints were the requirement for radiological drainage, the DPS placement failure rate, the rate of stoma closure and, lastly, feasibility of chemotherapy (if indicated).

resultsDPS placement was feasible in 92.8 % of the 14 patients (n = 13). The overall success rate for endoscopic management was 78.5 % (n = 11). The median length of hospitalization after DPS placement was 5 days (3-17). The average duration of drainage through a DPS was 62 days (28-181). Five patients (35.7 %) also underwent drainage with radiological guidance. Of the 10 patients with stoma, closure occurred in 80 %. All patients that required adjuvant chemotherapy were able to receive it.

conclusionThe treatment of AL requires multidisciplinary collaboration to save the anastomosis. DPS placement under endoscopic control is associated with AL healing, good clinical tolerance and the ability to undergo chemotherapy and is an alternative to repeat laparotomy when radiological drainage is unfeasible or inefficient.

Indexed as

StentsAdultAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakColorectal NeoplasmsDrainageEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRectumRetrospective StudiesConservative managementDouble pigtail drainsLeakRectum

Identifiers

PMID26183957
OpenAlexW911137750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.