ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2015
Formulaic Language in Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease: Complementary Effects of Subcortical and Cortical Dysfunction.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Four hundred Greek idiomatic expressions: Ratings for subjective frequency, ambiguity, and decomposability.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Reorganization of the Neurobiology of Language After Sentence Overlearning.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022Article
- Subcortical Involvement in Formulaic Language: Studies on Bilingual Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- Performance and Function Meet Structure: A White Matter Connection Tuned for Vocal Production.Brain connectivity · 2018Article
- Cortical-subcortical production of formulaic language: A review of linguistic, brain disorder, and functional imaging studies leading to a production model.Brain and cognition · 2018Review
- Switching Language Modes: Complementary Brain Patterns for Formulaic and Propositional Language.Brain connectivity · 2018Article
- The Affective Nature of Formulaic Language: A Right-Hemisphere Subcortical Process.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Evaluation, treatment, and analysis of a rare case of motor speech systems dyscoordination syndrome.Cogent medicine · 2017Article
- Towards the identification of Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease from the speech. New articulatory kinetic biomarkers.PloS one · 2017Article
- Tapping into neural resources of communication: formulaic language in aphasia therapy.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
- Your phrases matter: Third waves in research approaches and new contexts for formulaic language.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe production of formulaic expressions (conversational speech formulas, pause fillers, idioms, and other fixed expressions) is excessive in the left hemisphere and deficient in the right hemisphere and in subcortical stroke. Speakers with Alzheimer's disease (AD), having functional basal ganglia, reveal abnormally high proportions of formulaic language. Persons with Parkinson's disease (PD), having dysfunctional basal ganglia, were predicted to show impoverished formulaic expressions in contrast to speakers with AD. This study compared participants with PD, participants with AD, and healthy control (HC) participants on protocols probing production and comprehension of formulaic expressions.
methodSpontaneous speech samples were recorded from 16 individuals with PD, 12 individuals with AD, and 18 HC speakers. Structured tests were then administered as probes of comprehension.
resultsThe PD group had lower proportions of formulaic expressions compared with the AD and HC groups. Comprehension testing yielded opposite contrasts: participants with PD showed significantly higher performance compared with participants with AD and did not differ from HC participants.
conclusionsThe finding that PD produced lower proportions of formulaic expressions compared with AD and HC supports the view that subcortical nuclei modulate the production of formulaic expressions. Contrasting results on formal testing of comprehension, whereby participants with AD performed significantly worse than participants with PD and HC participants, indicate differential effects on procedural and declarative knowledge associated with these neurological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.