Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26183821›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Identifying alternatives to old age psychiatry inpatient admission: an application of the balance of care approach to health and social care planning.

Sue Tucker, Christian Brand, Mark Wilberforce, Michele Abendstern, David Challis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sue TuckerPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, Crawford House, Booth Street East, Manchester, M13 9QS, UK. sue.tucker@manchester.ac.uk.
Christian BrandPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, Crawford House, Booth Street East, Manchester, M13 9QS, UK. christian.brand@manchester.ac.uk.
Mark WilberforcePersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, Crawford House, Booth Street East, Manchester, M13 9QS, UK. mark.wilberforce@manchester.ac.uk.
Michele AbendsternPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, Crawford House, Booth Street East, Manchester, M13 9QS, UK. michele.abendstern@manchester.ac.uk.
David ChallisPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, Crawford House, Booth Street East, Manchester, M13 9QS, UK. david.challis@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0606-1109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health problems in older people are common and costly, posing multiple challenges for commissioners. Against this backdrop, a series of initiatives have sought to shift resources from institutional to community care in the belief that this will save money and concurs with user preferences. However, most of this work has focused on the use of care home beds and general hospital admissions, and relatively little attention has been given to reducing the use of mental health inpatient beds, despite their very high cost.

methodsThe study employed a 'Balance of Care approach' in three areas of North-West England. This long-standing strategic planning framework identifies people whose needs can be met in more than one setting, and compares the costs and consequences of the possible alternatives in a simulation modelling exercise. Information was collected about a six-month cohort of admissions in 2010/11 (n = 216). The sample was divided into groups of people with similar needs for care, and vignettes were formulated to represent the most prevalent groups. A range of key staff judged the appropriateness of these admissions and suggested alternative care for those considered least appropriate for hospital. A public sector costing approach was used to compare the estimated costs of the recommended care with that people currently receive.

resultsThe findings suggest that more than a sixth of old age psychiatry inpatient admissions could be more appropriately supported in other settings if enhanced community services were available. Such restructuring could involve the provision of intensive support from Care Home Outreach and Community Mental Health Teams, rather than the development of crisis intervention and home treatment teams as currently advocated. Estimated savings were considerable, suggesting local agencies might release up to £1,300,000 per annum. No obvious trade-off between health and social care costs was predicted.

conclusionsThere is considerable potential to change the mix of institutional and community services provided for older people with mental health problems. The conclusions would be strengthened by further studies and the incorporation of evidence about relative outcomes. However, the utility of the approach in challenging established patterns of resource allocation and building local ownership for change is apparent.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedHospitalizationSocial WorkAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCrisis InterventionEnglandFemaleHealth PlanningHealth Services Needs and DemandHospitals, GeneralHumansMalePatient DischargePsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID26183821
PMCPMC4504087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.