Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26183777›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2015

Temperature Effects on Kinetic Parameters and Substrate Affinity of Cel7A Cellobiohydrolases.

Trine Holst Sørensen, Nicolaj Cruys-Bagger, Michael Skovbo Windahl, Silke Flindt Badino, Kim Borch, Peter Westh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Removal ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2020
    Article
  13. Activity of fungal β-glucosidases on cellulose.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Trine Holst SørensenFrom Roskilde University, Nature, Systems, and Models, Research Unit for Functional Biomaterials, 1 Universitetsvej, Building 28, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark and.
Nicolaj Cruys-BaggerFrom Roskilde University, Nature, Systems, and Models, Research Unit for Functional Biomaterials, 1 Universitetsvej, Building 28, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark and.
Michael Skovbo WindahlFrom Roskilde University, Nature, Systems, and Models, Research Unit for Functional Biomaterials, 1 Universitetsvej, Building 28, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark and Novozymes A/S, Krogshøjvej 36, DK-2880 Bagsværd, Denmark.
Silke Flindt BadinoFrom Roskilde University, Nature, Systems, and Models, Research Unit for Functional Biomaterials, 1 Universitetsvej, Building 28, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark and Novozymes A/S, Krogshøjvej 36, DK-2880 Bagsværd, Denmark.
Kim BorchNovozymes A/S, Krogshøjvej 36, DK-2880 Bagsværd, Denmark.
Peter WesthFrom Roskilde University, Nature, Systems, and Models, Research Unit for Functional Biomaterials, 1 Universitetsvej, Building 28, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark and pwesth@ruc.dk.
Roskilde University · DKNovozymes (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We measured hydrolytic rates of four purified cellulases in small increments of temperature (10-50 °C) and substrate loads (0-100 g/liter) and analyzed the data by a steady state kinetic model that accounts for the processive mechanism. We used wild type cellobiohydrolases (Cel7A) from mesophilic Hypocrea jecorina and thermophilic Rasamsonia emersonii and two variants of these enzymes designed to elucidate the role of the carbohydrate binding module (CBM). We consistently found that the maximal rate increased strongly with temperature, whereas the affinity for the insoluble substrate decreased, and as a result, the effect of temperature depended strongly on the substrate load. Thus, temperature had little or no effect on the hydrolytic rate in dilute substrate suspensions, whereas strong temperature activation (Q10 values up to 2.6) was observed at saturating substrate loads. The CBM had a dual effect on the activity. On one hand, it diminished the tendency of heat-induced desorption, but on the other hand, it had a pronounced negative effect on the maximal rate, which was 2-fold larger in variants without CBM throughout the investigated temperature range. We conclude that although the CBM is beneficial for affinity it slows down the catalytic process. Cel7A from the thermophilic organism was moderately more activated by temperature than the mesophilic analog. This is in accord with general theories on enzyme temperature adaptation and possibly relevant information for the selection of technical cellulases.

Indexed as

TemperatureAlgorithmsAscomycotaBinding, CompetitiveCellobioseCelluloseCellulose 1,4-beta-CellobiosidaseElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelFungal ProteinsGenetic VariationHydrolysisHypocreaIsoenzymesKineticsProtein BindingSubstrate SpecificityCellobioseCelluloseCellulose 1,4-beta-CellobiosidaseFungal ProteinsIsoenzymescarbohydrate-binding proteincellulaseenzyme kineticsHypocrea jecorinaRasamsonia emersoniithermoactivationthermophile

Identifiers

PMID26183777
PMCPMC4571970
OpenAlexW2164112310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.